<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0526.tlg001.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="book" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0526.tlg001.perseus-eng2" n="3"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0526.tlg001.perseus-eng2:3" n="162"><milestone n="5" unit="Whiston_section"/><p>Besides these, the high priest put on a third garment, which was
called the <emph rend="italic">Ephod</emph>, which resembles the Epomis of the Greeks. Its
make was after this manner: it was woven to the depth of a cubit, of several
colors, with gold intermixed, and embroidered, but it left the middle of
the breast uncovered: it was made with sleeves also; nor did it appear
to be at all differently made from a short coat. But in the void place
of this garment there was inserted a piece of the bigness of a span, embroidered
with gold, and the other colors of the ephod, and was called <emph rend="italic">Essen,
</emph>[the breastplate,] .which in the Greek language signifies the <emph rend="italic">Oracle.
</emph>This piece exactly filled up the void space in the ephod. It was united
to it by golden rings at every corner, the like rings being annexed to
the ephod, and a blue riband was made use of to tie them together by those
rings; and that the space between the rings might not appear empty, they
contrived to fill it up with stitches of blue ribands. There were also
two sardonyxes upon the ephod, at the shoulders, to fasten it in the nature
of buttons, having each end running to the sardonyxes of gold, that they
might be buttoned by them. On these were engraven the names of the sons
of Jacob, in our own country letters, and in our own tongue, six on each
of the stones, on either side; and the elder sons’ names were on the right
shoulder. Twelve stones also there were upon the breast-plate, extraordinary
in largeness and beauty; and they were an ornament not to be purchased
by men, because of their immense value. These stones, however, stood in
three rows, by four in a row, and were inserted into the breastplate itself,
and they were set in ouches of gold, that were themselves inserted in the
breastplate, and were so made that they might not fall out low the first
three stones were a sardonyx, a topaz, and an emerald. The second row contained
a carbuncle, a jasper, and a sapphire. The first of the third row was a
ligure, then an amethyst, and the third an agate, being the ninth of the
whole number. The first of the fourth row was a chrysolite, the next was
an onyx, and then a beryl, which was the last of all. Now the names of
all those sons of Jacob were engraven in these stones, whom we esteem the
heads of our tribes, each stone having the honor of a name, in the order
according to which they were born. And whereas the rings were too weak
of themselves to bear the weight of the stones, they made two other rings
of a larger size, at the edge of that part of the breastplate which reached
to the neck, and inserted into the very texture of the breastplate, to
receive chains finely wrought, which connected them with golden bands to
the tops of the shoulders, whose extremity turned backwards, and went into
the ring, on the prominent back part of the ephod; and this was for the
security of the breastplate, that it might not fall out of its place. There
was also a girdle sewed to the breastplate, which was of the forementioned
colors, with gold intermixed, which, when it had gone once round, was tied
again upon the seam, and hung down. There were also golden loops that admitted
its fringes at each extremity of the girdle, and included them entirely.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0526.tlg001.perseus-eng2:3" n="172"><milestone n="6" unit="Whiston_section"/><p>The high priest’s mitre was the same that we described before, and
was wrought like that of all the other priests; above which there was another,
with swathes of blue embroidered, and round it was a golden crown polished,
of three rows, one above another; out of which arose a cup of gold, which
resembled the herb which we call <emph rend="italic">Saccharus;</emph> but those Greeks that
are skillful in botany call it <emph rend="italic">Hyoscyamus</emph>. Now, lest any one that
has seen this herb, but has not been taught its name, and is unacquainted
with its nature, or, having known its name, knows not the herb when he
sees it, I shall give such ,as these are a description of it. This herb
is oftentimes in tallness above three spans, but its root is like that
of a turnip (for he that should compare it thereto would not be mistaken);
but its leaves are like the leaves of mint. Out of its branches it sends
out a calyx, cleaving. to the branch; and a coat encompasses it, which
it naturally puts off when it is changing, in order to produce its fruit.
This calyx is of the bigness of the bone of the little finger, but in the
compass of its aperture is like a cup. This I will further describe, for
the use of those that are unacquainted with it. Suppose a sphere be divided
into two parts, round at the bottom, but having another segment that grows
up to a circumference from that bottom; suppose it become narrower by degrees,
and that the cavity of that part grow decently smaller, and then gradually
grow wider again at the brim, such as we see in the navel of a pomegranate,
with its notches. And indeed such a coat grows over this plant as renders
it a hemisphere, and that, as one may say, turned accurately in a lathe,
and having its notches extant above it, which, as I said, grow like a pomegranate,
only that they are sharp, and end in nothing but prickles. Now the fruit
is preserved by this coat of the calyx, which fruit is like the seed of
the herb Sideritis: it sends out a flower that may seem to resemble that
of poppy. Of this was a crown made, as far from the hinder part of the
head to each of the temples; but this <emph rend="italic">Ephielis</emph>, for so this calyx
may be called, did not cover the forehead, but it was covered with a golden
plate, <note resp="editor">The reader ought to take notice here, that the very Mosaic Petalon, or
golden plate, for the forehead of the Jewish high priest, was itself preserved,
not only till the days of Josephus, but of Origen; and that its inscription,
Holiness to the Lord, was in the Samaritan characters. See Antiq. B. VIII.
ch. 3. sect. 8, Essay on the Old Test. p. 154, and Reland, De pol. Templi,
p. 132.</note>
which had inscribed upon it the name of God in sacred characters. And such
were the ornaments of the high priest.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0526.tlg001.perseus-eng2:3" n="179"><milestone n="7" unit="Whiston_section"/><p>Now here one may wonder at the ill-will which men bear to us, and
which they profess to bear on account of our despising that Deity which
they pretend to honor; for if any one do but consider the fabric of the
tabernacle, and take a view of the garments of the high priest, and of
those vessels which we make use of in our sacred ministration, he will
find that our legislator was a divine man, and that we are unjustly reproached
by others; for if any one do without prejudice, and with judgment, look
upon these things, he will find they were every one made in way of imitation
and representation of the universe. When Moses distinguished the tabernacle
into three parts, <note resp="editor">When Josephus, both here and ch. 6. sect. 4, supposes the tabernacle to
have been parted into three parts, he seems to esteem the bare entrance
to be a third division, distinct from the holy and the most holy places;
and this the rather, because in the temple afterward there was a real distinct
third part, which was called the Porch: otherwise Josephus would contradict
his own description of the tabernacle, which gives as a particular account
of no more than two parts.</note>
and allowed two of them to the priests, as a place accessible and common,
he denoted the land and the sea, these being of general access to
all; but he set apart the third division for God, because heaven is inaccessible
to men. And when he ordered twelve loaves to be set on the table, he denoted
the year, as distinguished into so many months. By branching out the candlestick
into seventy parts, he secretly intimated the <emph rend="italic">Decani</emph>, or seventy
divisions of the planets; and as to the seven lamps upon the candlesticks,
they referred to the course of the planets, of which that is the number.
The veils, too, which were composed of four things, they declared the four
elements; for the fine linen was proper to signify the earth, because the
flax grows out of the earth; the purple signified the sea, because that
color is dyed by the blood of a sea shell-fish; the blue is fit to signify
the air; and the scarlet will naturally be an indication of fire. Now the
vestment of the high priest being made of linen, signified the earth; the
blue denoted the sky, being like lightning in its pomegranates, and in
the noise of the bells resembling thunder. And for the ephod, it showed
that God had made the universe of four elements; and as for the gold interwoven,
I suppose it related to the splendor by which all things are enlightened.
He also appointed the breastplate to be placed in the middle of the ephod,
to resemble the earth, for that has the very middle place of the world.
And the girdle which encompassed the high priest round, signified the ocean,
for that goes round about and includes the universe. Each of the sardonyxes
declares to us the sun and the moon; those, I mean, that were in the nature
of buttons on the high priest’s shoulders. And for the twelve stones, whether
we understand by them the months, or whether we understand the like number
of the signs of that circle which the Greeks call the <emph rend="italic">Zodiac</emph>, we
shall not be mistaken in their meaning. And for the mitre, which was of
a blue color, it seems to me to mean heaven; for how otherwise could the
name of God be inscribed upon it? That it was also illustrated with a crown,
and that of gold also, is because of that splendor with which God is pleased.
Let this explication <note resp="editor">This explication of the mystical meaning of the Jewish tabernacle and its
vessels, with the garments of the high priest, is taken out of Philo, and
fitted to Gentile philosophical notions. This may possibly be forgiven
in Jews, greatly versed in heathen learning and philosophy, as Philo had
ever been, and as Josephus had long been when he wrote these Antiquities.
In the mean time, it is not to be doubted, but in their education they
must have both learned more Jewish interpretations, such as we meet with
in the Epistle of Barnabas, in that to the Hebrews, and elsewhere among
the old Jews. Accordingly when Josephus wrote his books of the Jewish War,
for the use of the Jews, at which time he was comparatively young, and
less used to Gentile books, we find one specimen of such a Jewish interpretation;
for there (B. VII. ch. 5. sect. 5) he makes the seven branches of the temple-candlestick,
with their seven lamps, an emblem of the seven days of creation and rest,
which are here emblems of the seven planets. Nor certainly ought ancient
Jewish emblems to be explained any other way than according to ancient
Jewish, and not Gentile, notions. See of the War, B. I. ch. 33. sect. 2.</note>
suffice at present, since the course of my narration will often, and on
many occasions, afford me the opportunity of enlarging upon the virtue
of our legislator.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0526.tlg001.perseus-eng2:3" n="188"><milestone n="8" unit="Whiston_chapter"/><milestone n="1" unit="Whiston_section"/><head rend="align(center)">OF THE PRIESTHOOD OF AARON.</head><p>WHEN what has been described was brought to a conclusion, gifts not
being yet presented, God appeared to Moses, and enjoined him to bestow
the high priesthood upon Aaron his brother, as upon him that best of them
all deserved to obtain that honor, on account of his virtue. And when he
had gathered the multitude together, he gave them an account of Aaron’s
virtue, and of his good-will to them, and of the dangers he had undergone
for their sakes. Upon which, when they had given testimony to him in all
respects, and showed their readiness to receive him, Moses said to them,
 <q rend="double">O you Israelites, this work is already brought to a conclusion, in
a manner most acceptable to God, and according to our abilities. And now
since you see that he is received into this tabernacle, we shall first
of all stand in need of one that may officiate for us, and may minister
to the sacrifices, and to the prayers that are to be put up for us. And
indeed had the inquiry after such a person been left to me, I should have
thought myself worthy of this honor, both because all men are naturally
fond of themselves, and because I am conscious to myself that I have taken
a great deal of pains for your deliverance; but now God himself has determined
that Aaron is worthy of this honor, and has chosen him for his priest,
as knowing him to be the most righteous person among you. So that he is
to put on the vestments which are consecrated to God; he is to have the
care of the altars, and to make provision for the sacrifices; and he it
is that must put up prayers for you to God, who will readily hear them,
not only because he is himself solicitous for your nation, but also because
he will receive them as offered by one that he hath himself chosen to this
office.</q> <note resp="editor">It is well worth our observation, that the two principal qualifications
required in this section for the constitution of the first high priest,
(viz. that he should have an excellent character for virtuous and good
actions; as also that he should have the approbation of the people,) are
here noted by Josephus, even where the nomination belonged to God himself;
which are the very same qualifications which the Christian religion requires
in the choice of Christian bishops, priests, and deacons; as the Apostolical
Constitutions inform us, B. II. ch. 3.</note>
The Hebrews were pleased with what was said, and they gave their approbation
to him whom God had ordained; for Aaron was of them all the most deserving
of this honor, on account of his own stock and gift of prophecy, and his
brother’s virtue. He had at that time four sons, Nadab, Abihu, Eleazar,
and Ithamar.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0526.tlg001.perseus-eng2:3" n="193"><milestone n="2" unit="Whiston_section"/><p>Now Moses commanded them to make use of all the utensils which were
more than were necessary to the structure of the tabernacle, for covering
the tabernacle itself, the candlestick, and altar of incense, and the other
vessels, that they might not be at all hurt when they journeyed, either
by the rain, or by the rising of the dust. And when he had gathered the
multitude together again, he ordained that they should offer half a shekel
for every man, as an oblation to God; which shekel is a piece among the
Hebrews, and is equal to four Athenian drachmae. <note resp="editor">This weight and value of the Jewish shekel, in the days of Josephus, equal
to about 2s. 10d. sterling, is, by the learned Jews, owned to be one-fifth
larger than were their old shekels; which determination agrees perfectly
with the remaining shekels that have Samaritan inscriptions, coined generally
by Simon the Maccabee, about 230 years before Josephus published his Antiquities,
which never weigh more than 2s. 4d., and commonly but 2s. 4d. See Reland
De Nummis Samaritanorum, p. 138.</note>
Whereupon they readily obeyed what Moses had commanded; and the number
of the offerers was six hundred and five thousand five hundred and fifty.
Now this money that was brought by the men that were free, was given by
such as were about twenty years old, but under fifty; and what was collected
was spent in the uses of the tabernacle.</p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>