<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0086.tlg034.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="chapter" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0086.tlg034.perseus-eng2" n="16"><div type="textpart" subtype="subchapter" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0086.tlg034.perseus-eng2:16" n="5"><p>Discovery scenes constructed to prove the point are inartistic and so are all such scenes, but those are better which arise out of a reversal scene, as, for instance, in <q rend="double" type="title">The Washing.</q><note resp="Fyfe"><bibl n="Hom. Od. 19.392">Hom. Od. 19.392.</bibl> See preceding note.</note></p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="subchapter" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0086.tlg034.perseus-eng2:16" n="6"><p>In the second place come those which are manufactured by the poet and are therefore inartistic. For instance, in the <title>Iphigeneia</title><note resp="Fyfe">Euripides’ <title>Iphigeneia in Tauris</title>. See <bibl n="Aristot. Poet. 1452b">Aristot. Poet. 11.8</bibl>, note.</note> Orestes revealed himself. She was revealed to him through the letter, </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="subchapter" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0086.tlg034.perseus-eng2:16" n="7"><p>but Orestes says himself what the poet wants and not what the plot requires. So this comes near to the fault already mentioned, for he might just as well have actually brought some tokens.<note resp="Fyfe">To prove his identity Orestes mentions Pelops’ lance and other <q rend="double" type="emph">things from home,</q> which is much the same as producing visible tokens.</note> And there is <q rend="double" type="emph">the voice of the shuttle</q><note resp="Fyfe">When Philomela’s tongue was cut out, she wove in embroidery the story of her rape by Tereus. Thus the facts were discovered to her sister, Procne, by deliberate demonstration.</note> In Sophocles’ <title>Tereus</title>.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="subchapter" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0086.tlg034.perseus-eng2:16" n="8"><p rend="align(indent)"> The third kind is due to memory, to showing distress on seeing something. <milestone unit="page" resp="Bekker" n="1455a"/><milestone n="1" resp="Bekker" unit="line"/>An example of this is the scene in the <title>Cyprians</title> by Dicaeogenes; on seeing the picture he burst into tears<note resp="Fyfe">Teucer, returning to <placeName key="perseus,Salamis, Cyprus">Salamis</placeName> in disguise and seeing a portrait of his dead father Telamon, burst into tears and was thus discovered. So, too, in <title>The Two Gentlemen of <placeName key="perseus,Verona">Verona</placeName></title> Julia is discovered because she swoons on hearing Valentine offer Sylvia to his rival.</note>: and again in the <q rend="double" type="title">Tale of Alcinous,</q><note resp="Fyfe"><bibl n="Hom. Od. 8.521">Hom. Od. 8.521ff.</bibl></note> hearing the minstrel he remembered and burst into tears; and thus they were recognized.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="subchapter" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0086.tlg034.perseus-eng2:16" n="9"><p>The fourth kind results from an inference; for instance, in the <title>Choephoroe</title> <q rend="double" type="translation">Someone like me has come; but nobody is like me except Orestes; therefore he has come.</q> And there is Polyidus’s<note resp="Fyfe">A Sophist who either wrote an <title>Iphigeneia</title> with this denouement or more probably suggested in a work of criticism (cf. <bibl n="Aristot. Poet. 1455b">Aristot. Poet. 17.6</bibl>) that Orestes on being led to his fate should speculate aloud upon the odd coincidence that both he and his sister should be sacrificed, thus revealing his identity to Iphigeneia. Like most critics, Polyidos would have been a poor dramatist. There is an example of this form of discovery in the French opera <title xml:lang="fre">Coeur de Lion</title>, where the old knight says <q rend="double" type="spoken">goddam</q> and is thus discovered to be an Englishman.</note> idea about Iphigeneia, for it is likely enough that Orestes should make an inference that, whereas his sister was sacrificed, here is the same thing happening to him. And in Theodectes’ <title>Tydeus</title> that <q rend="double" type="translation">having come to find a son, he is perishing himself.</q> And the scene in the <title>Phineidae</title>, where on seeing the spot the women inferred their fate, that they were meant to die there for it was there that they had been exposed.<note resp="Fyfe">In these cases the inference was presumably uttered aloud and hence the identity of the speakers discovered. Nothing else is known of these plays.</note></p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>