<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg063.perseus-eng4" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg063.perseus-eng4:" n="37"><p><label>Hermotimus</label> It seems to me, Lycinus, you do not understand what I mean.</p><p><label>Lycinus</label> Very well, put it plainer, if it is something different from that.</p><p><label>Hermotimus</label> You will see in a minute. Let us suppose two people have gone into the temple of Asclepius or Dionysus, and subsequently one of the sacred cups is missing. Both of them will have to be searched, to see which has it about him.</p><p><label>Lycinus</label> Clearly.</p><p><label>Hermotimus</label> Of course one of them has it.</p><p><label>Lycinus</label> Necessarily, if it is missing.</p><p><label>Hermotimus</label> Then, if you find it on the first, you will not strip the other; it is clear he has not got it..</p><p><label>Lycinus</label> Quite.</p><p><label>Hermotimus</label> And if we fail to find it on the first, the other certainly has it; it is unnecessary to search him that way either.</p><p><label>Lycinus</label> Yes, he has it.</p><p><label>Hermotimus</label> So with us; if we find the cup in the possession of the Stoics, we shall not care to go on and search the others; we have what we were looking for; why trouble further?

</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>