<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg045.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg045.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="81"><p>
In general, the dancer should be perfect in every
point, so as to be wholly rhythmical, graceful, symmetrical, consistent, unexceptionable, impeccable,
not wanting in any way, blent of the highest qualities,
keen in his ideas, profound in his culture, and above
all, human in his sentiments. In fact, the praise that
he gets from the spectators will be consummate
when each of those who behold him recognises his
own traits, or rather sees in the dancer as in a
mirror his very self, with his customary feelings and
actions. Then people cannot contain themselves
for pleasure, and with one accord they burst into
applause, each seeing the reflection of his own soul
and recognising himself. Really, that Delphic
monition “Know thyself” realises itself in them
from the spectacle, and when they go away from the
theatre they have learned what they should choose
and what avoid, and have been taught what they
did not know before.



<pb n="v.5.p.285"/>
</p></div><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg045.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="82"><p>
As in literature, so too in dancing what is generally
called “bad taste” comes in when they exceed the
due limit of mimicry and put forth greater effort
than they should; if something large requires to
be shown, they represent it as enormous; if something dainty, they make it extravagantly effeminate,
and they carry masculinity to the point of savagery
and bestiality.
</p></div><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg045.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="83"><p>
Something of that sort, I remember, I once saw
done by a dancer who until then had been in high
esteem, as he was intelligent in every way and truly
worth admiring; but by some ill-luck, I know not
what, he wrecked his fortunes upon an ugly bit of
acting through exaggerated mimicry.<note xml:lang="eng" n="v.5.p.285.n.1"><p>Compare with this story that told of Pylades by Macrobius (Sat., II, 7, 16): cum in Hercule furente prodisset et non nullis incessum histrioni convenientem non servare videretur, deposita persona ridentes increpuit μωροί, μαινόμενον ὀρχοῦμαι. hac fabula et sagittas iecit in populum. </p></note>_ In presenting
Ajax going mad immediately after his defeat, he so
overleaped himself that it might well have been
thought that instead of feigning madness he was
himself insane; for he tore the clothes of one of the
men that beat time with the iron shoe,<note xml:lang="eng" n="v.5.p.285.n.2"><p>A shoe with heavy sole, originally of wood, but by Lucian’s time of iron (cf. Libanius, pro saltatoribus, 97), called in Greek κρούπεζα, in Latin scrupeda or scabellum, was worn by the flute-player or (as here) by a person specially assigned, the scabellarius, to mark the time for the dancer and the singers. An illustration of a flute-player wearing the scabellum, from a mosaic in the Vatican, will be found in Daremberg et Saglio, Dict. des Ant., s.v. scabellum (Fig. 6142). </p></note> and snatching
a flute from one of the accompanists, with a vigorous
blow he cracked the crown of Odysseus, who was
standing near and exulting in his victory; indeed, if
his watch-cap had not offered resistance and borne
the brunt of the blow, poor Odysseus would have
lost his life through falling in the way of a crazy
dancer. The pit, however, all went mad with Ajax,
leaping and shouting and flinging up their garments;




<pb n="v.5.p.287"/>

for the riff-raff, the absolutely unenlightened, took
no thought for propriety and could not perceive
what was good or what was bad, but thought that
sort of thing consummate mimicry of the ailment,
while the politer sort understood, to be sure, and were
ashamed of what was going on, but instead of censuring the thing by silence, they themselves applauded
to cover the absurdity of the dancing, although
they perceived clearly that what went on came from
the madness of the actor, not that of Ajax. For, not
content with all this, our hero did something else that
was far more laughable. Coming down among the
public, he seated himself among the senators,
between two ex-consuls, who were very much afraid
that he would seize one of them and drub him, taking
him for a wether!</p><p>
The thing caused some to marvel, some to laugh,
and some to suspect that perhaps in consequence of
his overdone mimicry he had fallen into the real
ailment.
</p></div><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg045.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="84"><p>
Moreover, the man himself, they say,
once he had returned to his sober senses, was so
sorry for what he had done that he really became
ill through distress and in all truth was given up
for mad. Indeed, he himself showed his repentance
clearly, for when his supporters asked him to dance
Ajax for them once more, begging to be excused,
he said to the audience, “For an actor, it is enough
to have gone mad once!”<note xml:lang="eng" n="v.5.p.287.n.1"><p>The point is that only a philosopher like Chrysippus may go mad more than once. Lucian delights in alluding to the story that Chrysippus took the hellebore treatment three times (True Story, 11, 18; Philosophies for Sale, 23). </p></note> What irked him most
was that his antagonist and rival, when cast for Ajax
in the same role, enacted his madness so discreetly


<pb n="v.5.p.289"/>

and sanely as to win praise, since he kept within the
bounds of the dance and did not debauch the histrionic art.
</p></div><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg045.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="85"><p>
These, my friend, are but a few out of manifold
achievements and activities of the dance, and I have
given you a glimpse of them in order that you may
not be highly displeased with me for viewing them
with ardent eyes. If you should care to join me in
looking on, I know very well that you will be wholly
enthralled and will even catch the dancer-craze. So
I shall not need to say to you what Circe said:

<cit><quote><l>Wonder holds me to see that you drained this
draught unenchanted.</l></quote><bibl>Odyssey, X, 326.</bibl></cit>

For you will be enchanted, and by Zeus it will not
be any donkey’s head or pig’s heart that you will
have, but your mind will be more firmly established
and you will be so enraptured that you will not give
even a tiny bit of the brew to anyone else to drink.
Homer says, you know, of the golden wand of Hermes
that he “charmeth the eyes of men” with it,

<cit><quote><l>Whomsoever he wishes, and others he wakes
that are sleeping.</l></quote><bibl>Odyss., V, 47-48.</bibl></cit>


Really, dancing does just that: it charms the eyes
and makes them wide awake, and it rouses the
mind to respond to every detail of its performances.
</p><p><label>CRATO</label>
Upon my word, Lycinus, I have come to the point
of believing you and am all agog, ear and eye alike.
Do remember, my friend, when you go to the theatre,
to reserve me a seat at your side, in order that you
may not be the only one to come back to us wiser!


</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>