<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg033.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg033.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="35"><p>
That is the way they make free with their dependants, yes, make game of them, gradually rendering
them submissive to their effrontery. I know a sharp-


<pb n="v.3.p.471"/>

tongued rhetorician who made a speech by request at
dinner in a style that was not by any means uncultivated, but very finished and studied. He was
applauded, however, because his speech, which was
delivered while they were drinking, was timed by
flasks of wine instead of measures of water! And he
took this venture on, it was said, for two hundred
drachmas.<note xml:lang="eng" n="v.3.p.471.n.1"><p>It was not the fashion at ancient banquets for guests to make speeches. In consenting to deliver a selection from his repertory, the rhetorician put himself on a par with a professional entertainer. This was bad enough, but he made things still worse by allowing the company to time his speech with a substitute for a water-clock which they improvised out of a flask of wine. </p></note></p><p>
All this is not so bad, perhaps. But if Divesf
himself has a turn for writing poetry or prose and
recites his own compositions at dinner, then you
must certainly split yourself applauding and flattering
him and excogitating new styles of praise. Some
of them wish to be admired for their beauty also,
and they must hear themselves called an Adonis
or a Hyacinthus, although sometimes they have
a yard of nose. If you withhold your praise, off you
go at once to the quarries of Dionysius because
you are jealous and are plotting against your master.
They must be philosophers and rhetoricians, too,
and if they happen to commit a solecism, precisely
on that account their language must seem full of
the flavour of Attica and of Hymettus, and it must
be the law to speak that way in future.
</p></div><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg033.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="36"><p>
After all, one could perhaps put up with the conduct of the men. But the women—! That is another
thing that the women are keen about—to have men
of education living in their households on a salary


<pb n="v.3.p.473"/>

and following their litters. They count it as one
among their other embellishments if it is said that
they are cultured and have an interest in philosophy
and write songs not much inferior to Sappho’s. To
that end, forsooth, they too trail hired rhetoricians and
grammarians and philosophers about, and listen to
their lectures—when? it is ludicrous!—either while
their toilet is being made and their hair dressed, or
at dinner; at other times they are too busy! And
often while the philosopher is delivering a discourse
the maid comes up and hands her a note from her
lover, so that the lecture on chastity is kept waiting
until she has written a reply to the lover and hurries
back to hear it.
</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>