<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg026.perseus-eng4" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg026.perseus-eng4:" n="24"><sp><speaker>Hermes</speaker><p>Diogenes of Sinope wanted! Bank, it is for you to speak.</p></sp><sp><speaker>Diogenes</speaker><p>Look here, Madam Justice, if she doesn’t stop bothering, I shall have assault and battery to answer for before long, instead of desertion; my stick is ready.</p></sp><sp><speaker>Justice</speaker><p>What is the meaning of this? Bank has run away, and Diogenes after her, with his stick raised. Poor Bank! I am afraid she will be roughly handled. Call Pyrrho. </p></sp></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg026.perseus-eng4:" n="25"><sp><speaker>Hermes</speaker><p>Here is Painting, but Pyrrho has never come up. I knew how it would be. <pb n="v.3.p.161"/> </p></sp><sp><speaker>Justice</speaker><p>And what was his reason?</p></sp><sp><speaker>Hermes</speaker><p>He holds that there is no such thing as a true decision.</p></sp><sp><speaker>Justice</speaker><p>Then judgement goes against him by default. Now for the Syrian advocate. The indictments were only filed a day or two ago; there wasno such hurry. However—. We will first take the case in which Rhetoric is plaintiff. How people crowd in to hear it!</p></sp><sp><speaker>Hermes</speaker><p>Just so: the case has not had -time to get stale, you see; it has the charm of novelty, the indictment, as you say, having only been filed yesterday. The prospect, too, of hearing the Syrian defend himself against two such plaintiffs as Rhetoric and Dialogue, one after the other, is a great attraction, Well, Rhetoric, when are you going to begin? </p></sp></div></div></body></text></TEI>