<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg026.perseus-eng4" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg026.perseus-eng4:" n="22"><sp><speaker>Porch</speaker><p>Not yet! Let me ask him a few questions.</p></sp><sp><speaker>Epicurus</speaker><p>Yes? I am ready.</p></sp><sp><speaker>Porch</speaker><p>You hold toil to be an evil?</p></sp><sp><speaker>Epicurus</speaker><p>I do.</p></sp><sp><speaker>Porch</speaker><p>And pleasure a good?</p></sp><sp><speaker>Epicurus</speaker><p>Unquestionably.</p></sp><sp><speaker>Porch</speaker><p>Do you recognize the distinction between differentia and indifferentia? between praeposita and rejecta?</p></sp><sp><speaker>Epicurus</speaker><p>Why, certainly.</p></sp><sp><speaker>Hermes</speaker><p>Madan, this discussion must cease; the jury say they do not understand word-chopping. They will now give their votes, <pb n="v.3.p.160"/> Porch. Ah; I should have won, if I could have tried him with my third figure of self-evidents.</p></sp><sp><speaker>Justice</speaker><p>Who wins?</p></sp><sp><speaker>Hermes</speaker><p>Unanimous verdict for Pleasure.</p></sp><sp><speaker>Porch</speaker><p>1 appeal to Zeus.</p></sp><sp><speaker>Justice</speaker><p>By all means. Next case, Hermes. </p></sp></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg026.perseus-eng4:" n="23"><sp><speaker>Hermes</speaker><p>Luxury v. Virtue, re Aristippus; Aristippus must appear in person.</p></sp><sp><speaker>Virtue</speaker><p>I ought to speak first. Aristippus is mine; his words and his deeds alike proclaim him mine.</p></sp><sp><speaker>Luxury</speaker><p>On the contrary, any one who will observe his garlands and his purple robes and his perfumes will agree that he is mine.</p></sp><sp><speaker>Justice</speaker><p>Peace! This suit must stand over, until Zeus has decided the appeal re Dionysius. The cases are similar. If Porch wins her appeal, Aristippus shall be adjudged to Virtue: if not, Luxury must have him. Bring the next case. By the way, those jurors must not have their fee; they have not earned it.</p></sp><sp><speaker>Hermes</speaker><p>So the poor old gentlemen have climbed up all this way for nothing!</p></sp><sp><speaker>Justice</speaker><p>Well, they must be content with a third. Now go away, all of you, and don’t be cross; you shall have another chance. </p></sp></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg026.perseus-eng4:" n="24"><sp><speaker>Hermes</speaker><p>Diogenes of Sinope wanted! Bank, it is for you to speak.</p></sp><sp><speaker>Diogenes</speaker><p>Look here, Madam Justice, if she doesn’t stop bothering, I shall have assault and battery to answer for before long, instead of desertion; my stick is ready.</p></sp><sp><speaker>Justice</speaker><p>What is the meaning of this? Bank has run away, and Diogenes after her, with his stick raised. Poor Bank! I am afraid she will be roughly handled. Call Pyrrho. </p></sp></div></div></body></text></TEI>