<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg025.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg025.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="37"><sp rend="merge"><speaker>FRANKNESS</speaker><p>These self-styled philosophers do just that, and I for my part abused their sort, and shall never stop criticizing and ridiculing them. But as for you and those who resemble you—for there are, there are some who truly cultivate philosophy and abide by your laws—may I never be so insane as to say anything abusive or unkind of you! What could I say? What is there of that nature in the lives that you have led? But those pretenders and miscreants deserve in my opinion to be hated. Come, now, Pythagoras, Plato, Chrysippus, Aristotle—what do you say? Have their sort anything to do with you, <pb n="v.3.p.57"/> ov have they displayed any similarity or kinship in their mode of life? Aye, “Heracles and the monkey, as the proverb has it!<note xml:lang="eng" n="v.3.p.57.n.1"><p>You are no more like these men than Heracles was like the monkey that wore the lion’s skin. Cf. § 32, and Lover of Lies, § 5. </p></note> Because they have long beards and claim to be philosophers and look sour, ought they to be compared with you? [could have: put up with it if they were at least convincing in their roles, but as things are, it would be easier for a buzzard to imitate a nightingale than for them to imitate philosophers.</p><p> I have said all that I had to say in my own defence. Truth, tell them whether it is true. </p></sp></div><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg025.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="38"><sp><speaker>PHILOSOPHY</speaker><p> Stand aside, Frankness; still farther ... What are we to do? What did you think of the man’s speech? </p></sp><sp><speaker>TRUTH</speaker><p> For my part, Philosophy, while he was speaking I prayed that I might sink into the earth, so true was everything that he said. In fact, as I listened, I recognized each of the men who act that way and applied his remarks to them: “That refers to this man; so-and-so does that.” In short, he portrayed the gentlemen to the life, as in a painting, accurate likenesses in every respect, depicting not only their persons, but their very souls‘as faithfully as could be. </p></sp><sp><speaker>VIRTUE</speaker><p> I, Virtue, also had to blush for shame. </p></sp><sp><speaker>PHILOSOPHY</speaker><p> And what say you?</p></sp><pb n="v.3.p.59"/><sp><speaker>PLATO</speaker><p> What else but to acquit him of the charge and set him down as our friend and benefactor? Indeed, just what happened to the Ilians<note xml:lang="eng" n="v.3.p.59.n.1"><p>The latter-day Trojans. </p></note> has happened to us— we have brought down upon ourselves an actor of tragedies to hold forth about the woes of the Trojans! Let him hold forth, then, and make tragedies out of these miscreants. </p></sp><sp><speaker>DIOGENES</speaker><p> I, too, Philosophy, commend the man highly, take back my complaint and count him a friend, for he is a gallant fellow. </p></sp></div></div></body></text></TEI>