<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg018.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg018.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="39"><sp><speaker>TIMOCLES</speaker><p>For my part I don’t think that any further proof is
necessary on top of all this. Nevertheless I'll tell
ou. Answer me this: do you think that Homer is
the best poet?
</p></sp><sp><speaker>DAMIS</speaker><p>Yes, certainly,
</p></sp><sp><speaker>TIMOCLES</speaker><p>Well, it was he that convinced me with his portrayal of the providence of the gods.
</p></sp><sp><speaker>DAMIS</speaker><p>But, my admirable friend, everybody will agree
with you that Homer is a good poet, to be sure, but not that he or any other poet whatsoever is a truthful witness. They do not pay any heed to truth, I take it, but only to charming their hearers, and to this end they enchant them with metres and entrance <pb n="v.2.p.151"/> them with fables and in a word do anything to give pleasure. </p></sp></div><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg018.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="40"><sp rend="merge"><speaker>DAMIS</speaker><p>However, I should like to know what it was of Homer’s that convinced you most. What he says about Zeus, how his daughter and his brother and his wife made a plot to fetter him?<note xml:lang="eng" n="v.2.p.151.n.1">Iliad 1, 396.</note> If Thetis had not summoned Briareus, our excellent Zeus would have been caught and put in chains. For this he returned thanks to Thetis by deceiving Agamemnon, sending a false vision to him, in order that many of the Achaeans might lose their lives.<note xml:lang="eng" n="v.2.p.151.n.2">Iliad 2, 5.</note> Don’t you see, it was impossible for him to hurl a thunderbolt and burn. up Agamemnon himself without making himself out a liar? Or perhaps you were most inclined to believe when you heard how Diomed wounded Aphrodite and then even Ares himself at the suggestion of Athena,<note xml:lang="eng" n="v.2.p.151.n.3">Iliad 5, 335, 855.</note> and how shortly afterwards the gods themselves fell to and began duelling promiscuously, males and females;<note xml:lang="eng" n="v.2.p.151.n.4">Iliad 20, 54.</note> Athena defeated Ares, already overtaxed, no doubt by the wound he had received from Diomed,<note xml:lang="eng" n="v.2.p.151.n.5">Iliad 21, 403.</note> and "Leto fought against Hermes, the stalwart god of good fortune.”<note xml:lang="eng" n="v.2.p.151.n.6">Iliad 20, 72.</note> Or perhaps you thought the tale about Artemis credible, that, being a fault-finding person, she got angry when she was not invited to a feast by Oeneus and so turned loose on his land a monstrous boar of irresistible strength.<note xml:lang="eng" n="v.2.p.151.n.7">Iliad 9, 533.</note> Did Homer convince you by saying that sort of thing? </p></sp></div><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg018.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="41"><sp><speaker>ZEUS</speaker><p>I say, gods! what a shout the crowd raised,
applauding Damis! Our man seems to be in a fix.

<pb n="v.2.p.153"/>

In fact he is sweating and quaking; it’s clear he is
going to throw up the sponge, and is already looking
about for a place to slip out and run away.
</p></sp><sp><speaker>TIMOCLES</speaker><p>I suppose you don’t think that Euripides is telling
the truth either, when he puts the gods themselves
on the stage and shows them saving the herves and
destroying villains and impious fellows like yourself?
</p></sp><sp><speaker>DAMIS</speaker><p>Why, Timocles, you doughtiest of philosophers, if
the playwrights have convinced you by doing this,
you must needs believe either that Polus and Aristodemus and Satyrus are gods for the nonce, or that
the very masks representing the gods, the buskins, the trailing tunics, the cloaks, gauntlets, padded
paunches and all the other things with which they
make tragedy grand are divine; and that is
thoroughly ridiculous. I assure you when Euripides,
following his own devices, says what he thinks without being under any constraint imposed by the requirements of his plays, you will hear him speaking
frankly then:

<cit><quote><l>Dost see on high this boundless sweep of air</l><l>That lappeth earth about in yielding arms?</l><l>Hold this to be Zeus, and believe it God.</l></quote><bibl>From a lost play. These verses are translated by Cicero (Nat. Deor. ii, 25, 65).</bibl></cit>

And again:
<cit><quote><l>'Twas Zeus, whoever Zeus is, for I know
Him not, except by hearsay.</l></quote><bibl>From the lost Melanippe the Wise. The line was unfavourably received and subseqnently changed (Plut. Mor. 756 c).</bibl></cit>

and so on.


<pb n="v.2.p.155"/>
</p></sp></div></div></body></text></TEI>