<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg018.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg018.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="37"><sp><speaker>DAMIS</speaker><p>And when can they find time for me, when they
have so many cares, you say, and manage all creation,
which is unlimited in its extent? That is why they
have not yet paid.you back for all your false oaths
and everything else—I don’t want to be forced to
deal in abuse like you, contrary to our stipulations:
and yet I don’t see what better manifestation of
their providence they could have made than to crush
your life out miserably, miserable sinner that you are!
But it is clear that they are away from home, across
the Ocean, no doubt, visiting the guileless Ethiopians.<note xml:lang="eng" n="v.2.p.147.n.1">Iliad, 1, 423.</note> At any rate it is their custom to go and dine
with them continually, even self-invited at times.

</p></sp></div><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg018.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="38"><sp><speaker>TIMOCLES</speaker><p>What can I say in reply to all this impudence,
Damis?
</p></sp><sp><speaker>DAMIS</speaker><p>Tell me what I wanted you to tell me long ago,
how you were induced to believe that the gods
exercise providence.
</p></sp><sp><speaker>TIMOCLES</speaker><p>In the first place the order of nature convinced
me, the sun always going the same road and the
moon likewise and the seasons changing and plants
growing and living creatures being born, and these
latter so cleverly devised that they can support life
and move and think and walk and build houses and
cobble shoes—and all the rest of it; these seem to
me to be works of providence.
</p></sp><sp><speaker>DAMIS</speaker><p>That is just the question, Timocles, and you are
trying to beg it, for it is not yet proved that each of

<pb n="v.2.p.149"/>

these things is accomplished by providence. While
I myself would say that recurrent phenomena are
as you describe them, I need not, however, at once
admit a conviction that they recur by some sort of
providence, for it is possible that they began at
random<note xml:lang="eng" n="v.2.p.149.n.1">In my opinion ἄλλως contrasts with ὁμοίως καὶ κατὰ ταὐτά, not with ὑπό τινος προμηθείας. The idea is more fully and clearly presented in Lucretius 1, 1024-1028.</note> and now take place with uniformity and
regularity. But you call necessity “order” and then,
forsooth, get angry if anyone does not follow you
when you catalogue and extol the characteristics of
these phenomena and think it a proof that each of
them is ordered by providence. So, in the words
of the comic poet,
<quote><l>That’s but a sorry answer; try again.</l></quote>
</p></sp></div></div></body></text></TEI>