<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg018.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg018.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="36"><sp><speaker>TIMOCLES</speaker><p>Very well. Tell me then, you scoundrel, don’t
you think the gods exercise any providence?
</p></sp><sp><speaker>DAMIS</speaker><p>Not in the least.
</p></sp><sp><speaker>TIMOCLES</speaker><p>What’s that you say? Then is all that we see
about us uncared for by any providence?
</p></sp><sp><speaker>DAMIS</speaker><p>Yes.
</p></sp><sp><speaker>TIMOCLES</speaker><p>And the administration of the universe is not
directed by any god?
</p></sp><sp><speaker>DAMIS</speaker><p>No.
</p></sp><sp><speaker>TIMOCLES</speaker><p>And everything drifts at random?
</p></sp><sp><speaker>DAMIS</speaker><p>Yes.
</p></sp><sp><speaker>TIMOCLES</speaker><p>Men, do you hear that and put up with it? Aren’t
you going to stone the villain?
</p></sp><sp><speaker>DAMIS</speaker><p>Why do you embitter men against me, Timocles?
And who are you to get angry on behalf of the gods,
especially when they themselves are not angry?
They have done me no harm, you see, though they
have listened to me long—if indeed they have ears.
</p></sp><sp><speaker>TIMOCLES</speaker><p>Yes, they have, Damis, they have, and they will
punish you some day in the hereafter.


<pb n="v.2.p.147"/>
</p></sp></div><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg018.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="37"><sp><speaker>DAMIS</speaker><p>And when can they find time for me, when they
have so many cares, you say, and manage all creation,
which is unlimited in its extent? That is why they
have not yet paid.you back for all your false oaths
and everything else—I don’t want to be forced to
deal in abuse like you, contrary to our stipulations:
and yet I don’t see what better manifestation of
their providence they could have made than to crush
your life out miserably, miserable sinner that you are!
But it is clear that they are away from home, across
the Ocean, no doubt, visiting the guileless Ethiopians.<note xml:lang="eng" n="v.2.p.147.n.1">Iliad, 1, 423.</note> At any rate it is their custom to go and dine
with them continually, even self-invited at times.

</p></sp></div><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg018.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="38"><sp><speaker>TIMOCLES</speaker><p>What can I say in reply to all this impudence,
Damis?
</p></sp><sp><speaker>DAMIS</speaker><p>Tell me what I wanted you to tell me long ago,
how you were induced to believe that the gods
exercise providence.
</p></sp><sp><speaker>TIMOCLES</speaker><p>In the first place the order of nature convinced
me, the sun always going the same road and the
moon likewise and the seasons changing and plants
growing and living creatures being born, and these
latter so cleverly devised that they can support life
and move and think and walk and build houses and
cobble shoes—and all the rest of it; these seem to
me to be works of providence.
</p></sp><sp><speaker>DAMIS</speaker><p>That is just the question, Timocles, and you are
trying to beg it, for it is not yet proved that each of

<pb n="v.2.p.149"/>

these things is accomplished by providence. While
I myself would say that recurrent phenomena are
as you describe them, I need not, however, at once
admit a conviction that they recur by some sort of
providence, for it is possible that they began at
random<note xml:lang="eng" n="v.2.p.149.n.1">In my opinion ἄλλως contrasts with ὁμοίως καὶ κατὰ ταὐτά, not with ὑπό τινος προμηθείας. The idea is more fully and clearly presented in Lucretius 1, 1024-1028.</note> and now take place with uniformity and
regularity. But you call necessity “order” and then,
forsooth, get angry if anyone does not follow you
when you catalogue and extol the characteristics of
these phenomena and think it a proof that each of
them is ordered by providence. So, in the words
of the comic poet,
<quote><l>That’s but a sorry answer; try again.</l></quote>
</p></sp></div><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg018.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="39"><sp><speaker>TIMOCLES</speaker><p>For my part I don’t think that any further proof is
necessary on top of all this. Nevertheless I'll tell
ou. Answer me this: do you think that Homer is
the best poet?
</p></sp><sp><speaker>DAMIS</speaker><p>Yes, certainly,
</p></sp><sp><speaker>TIMOCLES</speaker><p>Well, it was he that convinced me with his portrayal of the providence of the gods.
</p></sp><sp><speaker>DAMIS</speaker><p>But, my admirable friend, everybody will agree
with you that Homer is a good poet, to be sure, but not that he or any other poet whatsoever is a truthful witness. They do not pay any heed to truth, I take it, but only to charming their hearers, and to this end they enchant them with metres and entrance <pb n="v.2.p.151"/> them with fables and in a word do anything to give pleasure. </p></sp></div><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg018.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="40"><sp rend="merge"><speaker>DAMIS</speaker><p>However, I should like to know what it was of Homer’s that convinced you most. What he says about Zeus, how his daughter and his brother and his wife made a plot to fetter him?<note xml:lang="eng" n="v.2.p.151.n.1">Iliad 1, 396.</note> If Thetis had not summoned Briareus, our excellent Zeus would have been caught and put in chains. For this he returned thanks to Thetis by deceiving Agamemnon, sending a false vision to him, in order that many of the Achaeans might lose their lives.<note xml:lang="eng" n="v.2.p.151.n.2">Iliad 2, 5.</note> Don’t you see, it was impossible for him to hurl a thunderbolt and burn. up Agamemnon himself without making himself out a liar? Or perhaps you were most inclined to believe when you heard how Diomed wounded Aphrodite and then even Ares himself at the suggestion of Athena,<note xml:lang="eng" n="v.2.p.151.n.3">Iliad 5, 335, 855.</note> and how shortly afterwards the gods themselves fell to and began duelling promiscuously, males and females;<note xml:lang="eng" n="v.2.p.151.n.4">Iliad 20, 54.</note> Athena defeated Ares, already overtaxed, no doubt by the wound he had received from Diomed,<note xml:lang="eng" n="v.2.p.151.n.5">Iliad 21, 403.</note> and "Leto fought against Hermes, the stalwart god of good fortune.”<note xml:lang="eng" n="v.2.p.151.n.6">Iliad 20, 72.</note> Or perhaps you thought the tale about Artemis credible, that, being a fault-finding person, she got angry when she was not invited to a feast by Oeneus and so turned loose on his land a monstrous boar of irresistible strength.<note xml:lang="eng" n="v.2.p.151.n.7">Iliad 9, 533.</note> Did Homer convince you by saying that sort of thing? </p></sp></div></div></body></text></TEI>