<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg009.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg009.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="16"><p>

The same thing is bound to happen, I think, to a man
who tries to show his eloquence among works of art
like these. Amid the mass of beautiful things, what
he says goes unheeded, vanishes and is absorbed, as if a
candle were taken toa great fire and thrown in, or’
an ant pointed out on the back of an elephant or a
camel. This danger, certainly, the speaker must
guard against, and also that his voice be not disturbed
when he speaks in a hall so musical and echoing, for
it resounds, replies, refutes—in fact, it drowns his
utterance, just as the trumpet drowns the flute when
they are played together, and as the sea drowns
chanty-men when they undertake to sing for the
rowers against the noise of the surf. For the great
volume of sound overpowers and crushes into silence
all that is weaker.

</p></div><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg009.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="17"><p>
"As to the other point which my opponent made,
that a beautiful hall spurs a speaker on and makes
him more ambitious, I think it does the opposite.
It dazzles and frightens him, disturbs his thought
and makes him more timid, for he reflects that it is
disgraceful beyond everything that his discourse


<pb n="v.1.p.195"/>

should not match a place so beautiful. For such surroundings put a man most clearly to the proof. It is
’ asif he should put on a handsome coat of mail and then
take to his heels.before the rest, making his cowardice
only the more conspicuous for his armour. This,
‘I think, is the consideration which causes Homer's
famous orator<note xml:lang="eng" n="1">Odysseus: Il. 3, 219.</note> to think very little of good-looks and
even make himself appear ‘ an utter know-nothing’ in
order that the beauty of his words may seem more
striking by comparison with that which is uglier.
Besides, it is inevitable that the speaker’s own mind
should be occupied in looking, and that the accuracy
of his thinking should be disturbed because what he
is looking at gets the better of him, attracts him and
‘does not allow him to attend to what he is saying.
So how can he help speaking very badly, when in
spirit he is busied with the praise of all that he sees?

</p></div><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg009.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="18"><p>

“I forbear to say that even those who are
present and have been invited to the lecture become
spectators instead of hearers when they enter such a
hall as this, and no speaker is enough of a Demodocus, a Phemius, a Thamyris, an Amphion or an
Orpheus to distract their minds from looking. Why,
every one of them is flooded with beauty the instant
he crosses the threshold, and does not give the least
sign of hearing <note xml:lang="eng" n="2">Il, 23, 430.</note> what the speaker says or anything
else, but is all absorbed in what he sees, unless he is
stone-blind or like the court of the Areopagus,
listens in the dark!

</p></div><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg009.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="19"><p>

That the power of the tongue
is no match for the eyes, one can learn by comparing





<pb n="v.1.p.197"/>

the story of the Sirens with the one about the
Gorgons. The Sirens charmed passing voyagers by
making music and working on them with songs, and
held them long when they put in. In short, their
performance only exacted a delay, and no doubt one
or another voyager went by them, neglecting their
music. On the contrary, the beauty of the Gorgons, °
being extremely powerful and affecting the very
vitals of the soul, stunned its beholdersand made
them speechless, so that, as the story has it and
everyone says, they turned to stone in wonder.
For this reason I count what my opponent said
to you a moment ago about the peacock a plea for
my side: surely his attractiveness is in his looks,
not in his voice! If anybody should match a nightingale or a swan against him, letting them sing -
and showing the peacock silent while they were
singing, I “know well that your soul would go
over to him, bidding a long farewell to their songs.
So invincible, it seems, is the delight of the eyes!
</p></div><div type="textpart" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0062.tlg009.perseus-eng2" subtype="section" n="20"><p>

If you wish, I will produce you a witness in the
person of a sage, who will testify on the spot that
what one sees is far more effective than what
one hears. Crier, summon in person Herodotus, son
‘of Lyxus, of Halicarnassus. Since he has been
so kind as to comply, let him take the stand and
give his testimony. Suffer him to speak to you in
Ionic, to which he is accustomed.
“'Master Point o’ View telleth ye true herein.
Believe whatso he sayeth to this matter, esteeming
sight over hearing, for in sooth ears be less trusty
than eyes.’
<note xml:lang="eng" n="1">Only the last clause is really Herodotean (I, 8, 3).</note>


<pb n="v.1.p.199"/>

“Do you hear what the witness says, that he gives
the palm to sight? With reason, for words are
winged and go flying off the instant they have left
the lips, while the beauty of things seen is always
present and lasting and entices the spectator, will
he, nill he.
</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>