<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg030.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="book" n="6"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="506"><p><said who="#Socrates" rend="merge"><q type="spoken">Least of all,</q> he said. <q type="spoken">I fancy, at any rate,</q> said I, <q type="spoken">that the just and the honorable, if their relation and reference to the good is not known,<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">The personal or <foreign xml:lang="lat">ab urbe condita</foreign> construction. Cf. <title>Theaet.</title> 169 E.</note> will not have secured a guardian<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">the guardians must be able to give a reason, which they can do only by reference to the sanction. For the idea that the statesman must know better than other men. Cf. <title>Laws</title> 968 A, 964 C, 858 C-E, 817 C, Xen <title>Mem.</title> iii. 6. 8.</note> of much worth in the man thus ignorant, and my surmise is that no one will understand them adequately before he knows this.</q> <q type="spoken">You surmise well,</q> he said. <q type="spoken">Then our constitution  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="506b"/> will have its perfect and definitive organization<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">For the effect of the future perfect cf. 457 B <quote xml:lang="grc">λελέξεται</quote>465 A <quote xml:lang="grc">προστετάξεται</quote>, Eurip. <title>Heracleidae</title> 980 <quote xml:lang="grc">πεπράξεται</quote>.</note> only when such a guardian, who knows these things, oversees it.</q> 
<milestone ed="P" unit="para"/><q type="spoken">Necessarily,</q> he said. <q type="spoken">But you yourself, Socrates, do you think that knowledge is the good or pleasure or something else and different?</q> <q type="spoken">What a man it is,</q> said I; <q type="spoken">you made it very plain<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">For the personal construction 348 E, Isoc. <title>To Nic. I.</title> <foreign xml:lang="grc">καταφανής</foreign> is a variation in this idiom for <foreign xml:lang="grc">δῆλος</foreign>. Cf. also <title>Theaet.</title> 189 C, <title>Symp.</title> 221 B, <title>Charm.</title> 162 C, etc.</note> long ago that you would not be satisfied with what others think about it.</q> <q type="spoken">Why, it does not seem right to me either, Socrates,</q> he said, <q type="spoken">to be ready to state the opinions of others but not one’s own when one has occupied himself with the matter so long.<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Cf. 367 D-E.</note></q>  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="506c"/> <q type="spoken">But then,</q> said I, <q type="spoken">do you think it right to speak as having knowledge about things one does not know?</q> <q type="spoken">By no means,</q> he said, <q type="spoken">as having knowledge, but one ought to be willing to tell as his opinion what he opines.</q> <q type="spoken">Nay,</q> said I, <q type="spoken">have you not observed that opinions divorced from knowledge<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">This is not a contradiction of <title>Meno</title> 97 B, <title>Theaet.</title> 201 B-C and <title>Phileb.</title> 62 A-B, but simply a different context and emphasis. Cf. <title>Unity of Plato’s Thought,</title> p. 47, nn. 338 and 339.</note> are ugly things? The best of them are blind.<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Cf. on 484 C, <title>Phaedr.</title> 270 E.</note> Or do you think that those who hold some true opinion without intelligence differ appreciably from blind men who go the right way?</q> <q type="spoken">They do not differ at all,</q> he said. <q type="spoken">Is it, then, ugly things that you prefer  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="506d"/> to contemplate, things blind and crooked, when you might hear from others what is luminous<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Probably an allusion to the revelation of the mysteries. Cf. <title>Phaedr.</title> 250 C, <title>Phileb.</title> 16 C, <title>Rep.</title> 518 C, 478 C, 479 D, 518 A. It is fantastic to see in it a reference to what Cicero calls the <foreign xml:lang="lat">lumina orationis</foreign> of Isocratean style. The rhetoric and synonyms of this passage are not to be pressed.</note> and fair?</q> <q type="spoken">Nay, in heaven’s name, Socrates,</q> said Glaucon, <q type="spoken">do not draw back, as it were, at the very goal.<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Cf. <title>Phileb.</title> 64 C <quote xml:lang="grc">ἐπὶ μὲν τοῖς τοῦ ἀγαθοῦ ἤδη προθύροις</quote>, <quote>we are now in the vestibule of the good.</quote></note> For it will content us if you explain the good even as you set forth the nature of justice, sobriety, and the other virtues.</q> <q type="spoken">It will right well<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified"><foreign xml:lang="grc">καὶ μάλα</foreign>, <q type="emph">jolly well,</q> humorous emphasis on the point that it is much easier to <q type="emph">define</q> the conventional virtues than to explain the <q type="emph">sanction.</q> Cf. <title>Symp.</title> 189 A, <title>Euthydem.</title> 298 D-E, Herod. viii. 66. It is frequent in the <title>Republic.</title> Ritter gives forty-seven cases. I have fifty-four! But the point that matters is the humorous tone. Cf. e.g. 610 E.</note> content me, my dear fellow,</q> I said, <q type="spoken">but I fear that my powers may fail and that in my eagerness I may cut a sorry figure and become a laughing-stock.<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Excess of Zeal, <foreign xml:lang="grc">προθυμία</foreign>, seemed laughable to the Greeks. Cf. my interpretation of <title>Iliad</title> i. <foreign xml:lang="lat">in fine</foreign>, <title>Class. Phil.</title> xxii. (<date when="1927">1927</date>) pp. 222-223.</note> Nay, my beloved,  <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="506e"/> let us dismiss for the time being the nature of the good in itself;<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Cf. More, <title>Principia Ethica,</title> p. 17 <quote>Good, then, is indefinable; and yet, so far as I know, there is only one ethical writer, Professor Henry Sidgwick, who has clearly recognized and stated this fact.</quote></note> for to attain to my present surmise of that seems a pitch above the impulse that wings my flight today.<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">This is not superstitious mysticism but a deliberate refusal to confine in a formula what requires either a volume or a symbol. See Introd. p. xxvii, and my <title>Idea of Good in Plato’s Republic,</title> p. 212. <foreign xml:lang="grc">τὰ νῦν</foreign> repeats <foreign xml:lang="grc">τὸ νῦν εἶναι</foreign> (Cf. <title>Tim.</title> 48 C), as the evasive phrase <foreign xml:lang="grc">εἰσαῦθις</foreign> below sometimes lays the topic on the table, never to be taken up again. Cf. 347 E and 430 C.</note> But of what seems to be the offspring of the good and most nearly made in its likeness<note anchored="true" resp="Loeb" place="unspecified">Cf. <title>Laws</title> 897 D-E, <title>Phaedr.</title> 246 A.</note> I am willing to speak if you too wish it, and otherwise to let the matter drop.</q> <q type="spoken">Well, speak on,</q> he said, <q type="spoken">for you will duly pay me the tale of the parent another time.</q></said></p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>