<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg024.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="76"><milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="76"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="76a"/><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label><p>Well then, you speak of a surface, and also of a solid—the terms employed in geometrical problems?</p></said><said who="#Meno"><label>Men.</label><p>I do.</p></said><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label><p>So now you are able to comprehend from all this what I mean by figure. In every instance of figure I call that figure in which the solid ends; and I may put that more succinctly by saying that figure is <q type="emph">limit of solid.</q></p></said><said who="#Meno"><label>Men.</label><p>And what do you say of color, Socrates?</p></said><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label><p>How overbearing of you, Meno, to press an old man with demands for answers, when you will not trouble yourself <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="76b"/> to recollect and tell me what account Gorgias gives of virtue!</p></said><said who="#Meno"><label>Men.</label><p>When you have answered my question, Socrates, I will answer yours.</p></said><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label><p>One might tell even blindfolded, Meno, by the way you discuss, that you are handsome and still have lovers.</p></said><said who="#Meno"><label>Men.</label><p>Why so?</p></said><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label><p>Because you invariably speak in a peremptory tone, after the fashion of spoilt beauties, holding as they do a despotic power so long as their bloom is on them. You have also, I daresay, <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="76c"/> made a note of my weakness for handsome people. So I will indulge you, and answer.</p></said><said who="#Meno"><label>Men.</label><p>You must certainly indulge me.</p></said><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label><p>Then would you like me to answer you in the manner of Gorgias,<note resp="Loeb" anchored="true">There is something of Gorgias’ stately style in the definition that follows; but the implication seems mainly to be that the substance of it will be familiar to Meno because he was a pupil of Gorgias, who had learnt his science from Empedocles.</note> which you would find easiest to follow?</p></said><said who="#Meno"><label>Men.</label><p>I should like that, of course.</p></said><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label><p>Do not both of you say there are certain effluences<note resp="Loeb" anchored="true">Empedocles taught that material objects are known to us by means of effluences or films given off by them and suited in various ways to our sense-organs.</note> of existent things, as Empedocles held?</p></said><said who="#Meno"><label>Men.</label><p>Certainly.</p></said><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label><p>And passages into which and through which the effluences pass?</p></said><said who="#Meno"><label>Men.</label><p>To be sure.</p></said><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label><p>And some of the effluences fit into various passages, <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="76d"/> while some are too small or too large?</p></said><said who="#Meno"><label>Men.</label><p>That is so.</p></said><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label><p>And further, there is what you call sight?</p></said><said who="#Meno"><label>Men.</label><p>Yes.</p></said><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label><p>So now <quote>conceive my meaning,</quote> as Pindar <note resp="Loeb" anchored="true">Fr. 82 (Bergk); cf. <bibl n="Aristoph. Birds 939">Aristoph. Birds 939</bibl>.</note> says: color is an effluence of figures, commensurate with sight and sensible.</p></said><said who="#Meno"><label>Men.</label><p>Your answer, Socrates, seems to me excellently put.</p></said><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label><p>Yes, for I expect you find its terms familiar; and at the same time I fancy you observe that it enables you to tell what sound and smell are, and numerous other <milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="76e"/> things of the kind.</p></said><said who="#Meno"><label>Men.</label><p>Certainly.</p></said><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label><p>It is an answer in the high poetic style, Meno, and so more agreeable to you than that about figure.</p></said><said who="#Meno"><label>Men.</label><p>Yes, it is.</p></said><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label><p>But yet, son of Alexidemus, I am inclined to think the other was the better of the two; and I believe you also would prefer it, if you were not compelled, as you were saying yesterday, to go away before the mysteries, and could stay awhile and be initiated.</p></said></div></div></body></text></TEI>