I entered the grammar school of the teacher Dionysius, and saw there the young men who are accounted the most comely in form and of distinguished family, and their lovers. Now it chanced that two of the young people were disputing, but about what, I did not clearly overhear: it appeared, however, that they were disputing either about Anaxagoras The Ionian philosopher who lived in friendship with Pericles at Athens . or about Oenopides; A philosopher of Chios , distinguished as a geometer and astronomer. at any rate, they appeared to be drawing circles, 
 and they were imitating certain inclinations i.e., the slopes of the contours of the earth, and of the apparent course of the sun(ecliptic). with their arms, bending to it and taking it most earnestly. Then I—for I was sitting beside the lover of one of the pair—nudged him with my elbow and asked him what on earth the two youngsters were so earnest about, and I said: Is it then something great and fine, in which they are so earnestly immersed? Great and fine, indeed! he replied: why, these fellows are prating about the heavenly bodies, and babbling philosophy. Then I, surprised at his answer, said: Young man, do you consider philosophizing to be shameful? Else, why do you speak so sharply? Then the other youth—for he chanced to be sitting near him, as his rival in love—when he heard my question and his rival’s answer, said: You do yourself no good, Socrates, by pressing this fellow with a further question, as to whether he considers philosophizing to be shameful. Do you not know that he has spent the whole of his life in practising the neckhold, and stuffing himself, and sleeping? So why did you suppose he would make any other reply than that philosophy is shameful? Now this one of the two lovers had spent his time on humane studies, Literally, on music, which with the Greeks included poetry and general literature as well as music. whereas the other, whom he was abusing, had spent his on athletics. So I decided that I had best relinquish the other, whom I had been questioning, since he did not even himself set up to be experienced in words, but only in deeds; and that I should interrogate the one who set up to be wiser, in order that so far as I was able I might get some benefit from him. I said therefore: I addressed my question to both in common; but if you think you could answer more creditably than he, I put the same question to you as I did to him: do you consider philosophizing to be honorable or not? Then the two striplings, overhearing us speak somewhat like this, were silent, and ceasing from their own contention they became listeners to ours. What their lovers’ sensations were, I do not know, but I myself, at any rate, was staggered; for every time I am staggered by handsome young people. It seemed to me, however, that my young friend too was in as great a flutter as myself; but nevertheless he answered me in a most ambitious spirit: Why, of course, Socrates, he said, if I should ever consider philosophizing to be shameful, I should not account myself so much as a man,
 nor anyone else either who was disposed to think so. Here he pointed to his rival lover, and spoke with a loud voice, in order that his favorite might hear every word. Then I remarked: So philosophizing seems to you to be honorable? Quite so, he said. Well now, I said; does it seem to you possible to know whether anything is honorable or shameful without knowing what it is fundamentally? No, he said.
 Then do you know, I went on, what philosophizing is? Certainly I do, said he. Then what is it? I asked. Why, just what Solon called it; you know it was Solon who said: And ever, as I older grow, I learn yet more and more; Solon Fr. 18 —and I agree with him that a man who intends to philosophize should in this way be ever learning something or other, whether he be younger or older, in order that he may learn as many things as possible in his life. Now at first I felt there was something in his reply, but then, on second thoughts, I asked him whether he considered philosophy to be much learning.
 To which he answered: Certainly. And do you consider philosophy to be merely honorable, I asked, or good as well? Good as well, he said: very much so. Then do you observe this as peculiar to philosophy, or do you find it similarly in everything else? For example, do you consider the love of athletics to be not merely honorable, but good as well, or do you not? Whereupon he, most slily, gave a double answer: To him my statement must be neither ; but to you, Socrates, I acknowledge it to be both honorable and good: 
 for I consider this the right view. Then I asked him: Well now, in athletics, do you consider that much exercise is love of athletics? To which he replied: Certainly, just as in philosophizing I consider much learning to be philosophy. Then I said: And do you then consider that the lovers of athletics desire anything else than that which will cause them to be in good bodily condition? Only that, he replied. And does much exercise, I asked, cause them to be in good bodily condition?