<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg010.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="51"><milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="51"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="51a"/><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> Very good.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> So I will turn to them and try to explain them;  for I do not in the least agree with those who say that all pleasures are merely surcease from pain, but, as I said, I use them as witnesses to prove that some pleasures are apparent, but not in any way real, and that there are others which appear to be both great and numerous, but are really mixed up with pains and with cessations of the greatest pains and distresses of body and soul.</said></p><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="51b"/><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> But what pleasures, Socrates, may rightly be considered true?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Those arising from what are called beautiful colors, or from forms, most of those that arise from odors and sounds, in short all those the want of which is unfelt and painless, whereas the satisfaction furnished by them is felt by the senses, pleasant, and unmixed with pain.</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> Once more, Socrates, what do you mean by this?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> My meaning is certainly not clear at the first glance,
<milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="51c"/>and I must try to make it so.  For when I say beauty of form, I am trying to express, not what most people would understand by the words, such as the beauty of animals or of paintings, but I mean, says the argument, the straight line and the circle and the plane and solid figures formed from these by turning-lathes and rulers and patterns of angles;  perhaps you understand.  For I assert that the beauty of these is not relative, like that of other things, but they are always absolutely beautiful by nature
<milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="51d"/>and have peculiar pleasures in no way subject to comparison with the pleasures of scratching;  and there are colors which possess beauty and pleasures of this character.  Do you understand?</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> I am trying to do so, Socrates;  and I hope you also will try to make your meaning still clearer.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> I mean that those sounds which are smooth and clear and send forth a single pure note are beautiful, not relatively, but absolutely, and that there are pleasures which pertain to these by nature and result from them.</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> Yes, that also is true.</said></p><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="51e"/><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> The pleasures of smell are a less divine class;  but they have no necessary pains mixed with them, and wherever and in whatever we find this freedom from pain, I regard it always as a mark of similarity to those other pleasures.  These, then, are two classes of the pleasures of which I am speaking.  Do you understand me?</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> I understand.</said></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>