<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg010.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="48"><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> And shall we not find them full of ineffable pleasures?  Or must I remind you of the anger?<cit><quote type="verse"><l met="u">Which stirs a man, though very wise, to wrath,</l><l>And sweeter is than honey from the comb,</l></quote><bibl>Hom. Il. 18.108-109</bibl></cit>
<milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="48"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="48a"/>and of the pleasures mixed with pains, which we find in mournings and longings?</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> No, you need not remind me;  those things occur just as you suggest.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> And you remember, too, how people enjoy weeping at tragedies?</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> Yes, certainly.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> And are you aware of the condition of the soul at comedies, how there also we have a mixture of pain and pleasure?</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> I do not quite understand.</said></p><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="48b"/><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Indeed it is by no means easy, Protarchus, to understand such a condition under those circumstances.</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> No at least I do not find it so.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Well, then, let us take this under consideration, all the more because of its obscurity;  then we can more readily understand the mixture of pain and pleasure in other cases.</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> Please go on.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Would you say that envy, which was mentioned just now, was a pain of the soul, or not?</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> I say it is.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> But certainly we see the envious man rejoicing in the misfortunes of his neighbors.</said></p><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="48c"/><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> Yes, very much so.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Surely ignorance is an evil, as is also what we call stupidity.</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> Surely.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Next, then, consider the nature of the ridiculous.</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> Please proceed.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> The ridiculous is in its main aspect a kind of vice which gives its name to a condition;  and it is that part of vice in general which involves the opposite of the condition mentioned in the inscription at <placeName key="tgn,7010770">Delphi</placeName>.</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> You mean <q type="emph">Know thyself,</q> Socrates?</said></p><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="48d"/><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Yes;  and the opposite of that, in the language of the inscription, would evidently be not to know oneself at all.</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> Of course.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Protarchus, try to divide this into three.</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> How do you mean?  I am afraid I can never do it.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Then you say that I must now make the division?</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> Yes, I say so, and I beg you to do so, besides.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Must not all those who do not know themselves be affected by their condition in one of three ways?</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> How is that?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> First in regard to wealth;  such a man thinks he is
<milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="48e"/>richer than he is.</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> Certainly a good many are affected in that way.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> And there are still more who think they are taller and handsomer than they are and that they possess better physical qualities in general than is the case.</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> Certainly.</said></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>