<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg010.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="39"><milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="39"/><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="39a"/><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Memory unites with the senses, and they and the feelings which are connected with them seem to me almost to write words in our souls;  and when the feeling in question writes the truth, true opinions and true statements are produced in us;  but when the writer within us writes falsehoods, the resulting opinions and statements are the opposite of true.</said></p><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="39b"/><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> That is my view completely, and I accept it as stated.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Then accept also the presence of another workman in our souls at such a time.</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> What workman?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> A painter, who paints in our souls pictures to illustrate the words which the writer has written.</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> But how do we say he does this, and when?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> When a man receives from sight or some other sense the opinions and utterances of the moment and afterwards beholds in his own mind the images of those opinions and utterances. 
<milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="39c"/>That happens to us often enough, does it not?</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> It certainly does.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> And the images of the true opinions are true, and those of the false are false?</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> Assuredly.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Then if we are right about that, let us consider a further question.</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> What is it?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Whether this is an inevitable experience in relation to the present and the past, but not in relation to the future.</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> It is in the same relation to all kinds of time.</said></p><milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="39d"/><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Was it not said a while ago that the pleasures and pains which belong to the soul alone might come before the pleasures and pains of the body, so that we have the pleasure and pain of anticipation, which relate to the future?</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> Very true.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Do the writings and pictures, then, which we imagined a little while ago to exist within us, relate to the past and present,
<milestone unit="section" resp="Stephanus" n="39e"/>but not to the future?</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> To the future especially.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Do you say <q type="emph">to the future especially</q> because they are all hopes relating to the future and we are always filled with hopes all our lives?</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> Precisely.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> Well, here is a further question for you to answer.</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> What is it?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Soc.</label> A just, pious, and good man is surely a friend of the gods, is he not?</said></p><p><said who="#Protarchus"><label>Pro.</label> Certainly.</said></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>