<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg006.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="210"><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>SOC.</label> If, my boy, the command to add reason or explanation means learning to know and not merely getting an opinion about the difference, our splendid definition of knowledge would be a fine affair!  For learning to know is acquiring knowledge,

<milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="210"/><milestone n="210a" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>
is it not?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>THEAET.</label> Yes.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>SOC.</label> Then, it seems, if asked, <q type="spoken">What is knowledge?</q> our leader will reply that it is right opinion with the addition of a knowledge of difference;  for that would, according to him, be the addition of reason or explanation.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>THEAET.</label> So it seems.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>SOC.</label> And it is utterly silly, when we are looking for a definition of knowledge, to say that it is right opinion with knowledge, whether of difference or of anything else whatsoever.  So neither perception, Theaetetus, nor true opinion, nor reason or explanation
<milestone n="210b" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>
combined with true opinion could be knowledge.</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>THEAET.</label> Apparently not.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>SOC.</label> Are we then, my friend, still pregnant and in travail with knowledge, or have we brought forth everything?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>THEAET.</label> Yes, we have, and, by Zeus, Socrates, with your help I have already said more than there was in me.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>SOC.</label> Then does our art of midwifery declare to us that all the offspring that have been born are mere wind-eggs and not worth rearing?</said></p><p><said who="#Theaetetus"><label>THEAET.</label> It does, decidedly.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>SOC.</label> If after this you ever undertake to conceive other thoughts, Theaetetus, and do conceive,
<milestone n="210c" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>
you will be pregnant with better thoughts than these by reason of the present search, and if you remain barren, you will be less harsh and gentler to your associates, for you will have the wisdom not to think you know that which you do not know.  So much and no more my art can accomplish;  nor do I know aught of the things that are known by others, the great and wonderful men who are today and have been in the past.  This art, however, both my mother and I received from God, she for women and I for young and noble men and for all who are fair.
<milestone n="210d" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>
And now I must go to the Porch of the King, to answer to the suit which Meletus <note anchored="true" resp="Loeb">Meletus was one of those who brought the suit which led to the condemnation and death of Socrates.</note> has brought against me.  But in the morning, Theodorus, let us meet here again.</said></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>