SOC. Let it be, then, as we say now, that the syllable or combination is a single form arising out of the several conjoined elements, and that it is the same in words and in all other things. THEAET. Certainly. SOC. Therefore there must be no parts of it. THEAET. How so? SOC. Because if there are parts of anything, the whole must inevitably be all the parts; or do you assert also that the whole that has arisen out of the parts is a single concept different from all the parts? THEAET. Yes, I do. SOC. Do you then say that all and the whole are the same,
 
or that each of the two is different from the other? THEAET. I am not sure; but you tell me to answer boldly, so I take the risk and say that they are different. SOC. Your boldness, Theaetetus, is right; but whether your answer is so remains to be seen. THEAET. Yes, certainly, we must see about that. SOC. The whole, then, according to our present view, would differ from all? THEAET. Yes. SOC. How about this? Is there any difference between all in the plural and all in the singular? For instance, if we say one, two, three,
 
four, five, six, or twice three, or three times two, or four and two, or three and two and one, are we in all these forms speaking of the same or of different numbers? THEAET. Of the same. SOC. That is, of six? THEAET. Yes. SOC. Then in each form of speech we have spoken of all the six? THEAET. Yes. SOC. And again do we not speak of one thing when we speak of them all? THEAET. Assuredly. SOC. That is, of six? THEAET. Yes. SOC. Then in all things that are made up of number, we apply the same term to all in the plural and all in the singular? THEAET. Apparently. SOC. Here is another way of approaching the matter. The number of the fathom and the fathom are the same, are they not? THEAET. Yes. SOC. And of the furlong likewise. THEAET. Yes. SOC. And the number of the army is the same as the army, and all such cases are alike? In each of them all the number is all the thing. THEAET. Yes. SOC. And is the number of each anything but
 
the parts of each? THEAET. No. SOC. Everything that has parts, accordingly, consists of parts, does it not? THEAET. Evidently. SOC. But we are agreed that the all must be all the parts if all the number is to be the all. Cf. Plat. Theaet. 204b THEAET. Yes. SOC. Then the whole does not consist of parts, for if it consisted of all the parts it would be the all. THEAET. That seems to be true. SOC. But is a part a part of anything in the world but the whole? THEAET. Yes, of the all.