<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg005.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="418"><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> Not I, Hermogenes, am responsible, but those who gave the name.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> True.  Well, what is the origin of <foreign xml:lang="grc">ζημιῶδες</foreign>?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> What can the origin of <foreign xml:lang="grc">ζημιῶδες</foreign> be?  See, Hermogenes, how true my words are when I say that by adding and taking away letters people alter the sense of words so that even by very slight changes they sometimes make them mean the opposite of what they meant before;  as, for instance,
<milestone n="418b" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>in the case of the word <foreign xml:lang="grc">δέον</foreign> (obligation, right), for that just occurred to me and I was reminded of it by what I was going to say to you, that this fine modern language of ours has turned <foreign xml:lang="grc">δέον</foreign> and also <foreign xml:lang="grc">ζημιῶδες</foreign> round, so that each has the opposite of its original meaning, whereas the ancient language shows clearly the real sense of both words.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> What do you mean?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> I will tell you.  You know that our ancestors made good use of the sounds of iota and delta,
<milestone n="418c" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>and that is especially true of the women, who are most addicted to preserving old forms of speech.  But nowadays people change iota to eta or epsilon, and delta to zeta, thinking they have a grander sound.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> How is that?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> For instance, in the earliest times they called day <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἱμέρα</foreign>, others said <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἑμέρα</foreign>, and now they say <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἡμέρα</foreign>.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> That is true.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> Only the ancient word discloses the intention of the name-giver, don’t you know?  For day comes out of darkness to men;  they welcome it and long (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἱμείρουσι</foreign>) for it,
<milestone n="418d" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>and so they called it <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἱμέρα</foreign>.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> That is clear.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> But now <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἡμέρα</foreign> is masquerading so that you could not guess its meaning.  Why, some people think day is called <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἡμέρα</foreign> because it makes things gentle (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἥμερα</foreign>).</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> I believe they do.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> And you know the ancients called <foreign xml:lang="grc">ζυγόν</foreign> (yoke) <foreign xml:lang="grc">δυογόν</foreign>.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> Certainly.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> And <foreign xml:lang="grc">ζυγόν</foreign> conveys no clear meaning,
<milestone n="418e" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>but the name <foreign xml:lang="grc">δυογόν</foreign> is quite properly given to that which binds two together for the purpose of draught; now, however, we say <foreign xml:lang="grc">ζυγόν</foreign>.  There are a great many other such instances.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> Yes, that is plain.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> Similarly the word <foreign xml:lang="grc">δέον</foreign> (obligation) at first, when spoken in this way, denotes the opposite of all words connected with the good;  for although it is a form of good, <foreign xml:lang="grc">δέον</foreign> seems to be a bond (<foreign xml:lang="grc">δεσμός</foreign>) and hindrance of motion, own brother, as it were, to<foreign xml:lang="grc">βλαβερόν</foreign>.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> Yes, Socrates, it certainly does seem so.</said></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>