<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg005.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="409"><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> I think it would be clearer
<milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="409"/><milestone n="409a" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>if we were to use the Doric form of the name.  The Dorians call it <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἅλιος</foreign>.  Now <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἅλιος</foreign> might be derived from collecting (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἁλίζειν</foreign>) men when he rises, or because he always turns (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀεὶ εἱλεῖν</foreign>) about the earth in his course, or because he variegates the products of the earth, for variegate is identical with <foreign xml:lang="grc">αἰολλεῖν</foreign>.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> And what of the moon, Selene?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> That name appears to put Anaxagoras in an uncomfortable position.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> How so?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> Why, it seems to have anticipated by many years the recent doctrine of Anaxagoras,
<milestone n="409b" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>that the moon receives its light from the sun.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> How is that?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label><foreign xml:lang="grc">Σέλας</foreign> (gleam) and <foreign xml:lang="grc">φῶς</foreign> (light) are the same thing.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> Yes.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> Now the light is always new and old about the moon, if the Anaxagoreans are right;  for they say the sun, in its continuous course about the moon, always sheds new light upon it, and the light of the previous month persists.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> Certainly.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> The moon is often called <foreign xml:lang="grc">Σελαναία</foreign>.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> Certainly.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> Because it has always a new and old gleam (<foreign xml:lang="grc">σέλα νέον τε καὶ ἕνον</foreign>)
<milestone n="409c" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>the very most fitting name for it would be <foreign xml:lang="grc">Σελαενονεοάεια</foreign>, which has been compressed into <foreign xml:lang="grc">Σελαναία</foreign>.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> That is a regular opera bouffe name, Socrates. But what have you to say of the month (<foreign xml:lang="grc">μήν</foreign>) and the stars?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> The word <q type="emph">month</q> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">μείς</foreign>) would be properly pronounced <foreign xml:lang="grc">μείης</foreign>, from <foreign xml:lang="grc">μειοῦσθαι</foreign>, <gloss>to grow less,</gloss> and I think the stars (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἄστερα</foreign>) get their name from <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀστραπή</foreign> (lightning).  But <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀστραπή</foreign>, because it turns our eyes upwards (<foreign xml:lang="grc">τὰ ὦπα ἀναστρέθει</foreign>), would be called <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀναστρωπή</foreign>, which is now pronounced more prettily <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀστραπή</foreign>.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> And what of <foreign xml:lang="grc">πῦρ</foreign> (fire) and <foreign xml:lang="grc">ὕδωρ</foreign> (water)?
<milestone n="409d" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/></said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label><foreign xml:lang="grc">Πῦρ</foreign> is too much for me.  It must be that either the muse of Euthyphro has deserted me or this is a very difficult word.  Now just note the contrivance I introduce in all cases like this which are too much for me.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> What contrivance?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> I will tell you.  Answer me;  can you tell the reason of the word <foreign xml:lang="grc">πῦρ</foreign>?</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> Not I, by Zeus.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> See what I suspect about it.  I know that many Greeks,
<milestone n="409e" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>especially those who are subject to the barbarians, have adopted many foreign words.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> What of that?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> If we should try to demonstrate the fitness of those words in accordance with the Greek language, and not in accordance with the language from which they are derived, you know we should get into trouble.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> Naturally.
</said></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>