<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg005.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="399"><milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="399"/><milestone n="399a" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> You have faith in the inspiration of Euthyphro, it seems.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> Evidently.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> And you are right in having it;  for just at this very moment I think I have had a clever thought, and if I am not careful, before the day is over I am likely to be wiser than I ought to be.  So pay attention.  First we must remember in regard to names that we often put in or take out letters, making the names different from the meaning we intend, and we change the accent.
<milestone n="399b" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>Take, for instance, <foreign xml:lang="grc">Διὶ φίλος</foreign>;  to change this from a phrase to a name, we took out the second iota and pronounced the middle syllable with the grave instead of the acute accent (Diphilus).  In other instances, on the contrary, we insert letters and pronounce grave accents as acute.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> True.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> Now it appears to me that the name of men (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἄνθρωπος</foreign>) underwent a change of that sort.  It was a phrase, but became a noun when one letter, alpha, was removed and the accent of the last syllable was dropped.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> What do you mean?
<milestone n="399c" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/></said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> I will tell you.  The name <q type="emph">man</q> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἄνθρωπος</foreign>) indicates that the other animals do not examine, or consider, or look up at (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀναθρεῖ</foreign>) any of the things that they see, but man has no sooner seen—that is, <foreign xml:lang="grc">ὄπωπε</foreign>—than he looks up at and considers that which he has seen.  Therefore of all the animals man alone is rightly called man (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἄνθρωπος</foreign>), because he looks up at (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀναθρεῖ</foreign>) what he has seen (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ὄπωπε</foreign>).</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> Of course.  May I ask you about the next word I should like to have explained?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> Certainly.
<milestone n="399d" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/></said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> It seems to me to come naturally next after those you have discussed.  We speak of man’s soul and body.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> Yes, of course.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> Let us try to analyze these, as we did the previous words.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> You mean consider <q type="emph">soul</q> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ψυχή</foreign>) and see why it is properly called by that name, and likewise <q type="emph">body</q> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">σῶμα</foreign>)?</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> Yes.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> To speak on the spur of the moment, I think those who gave the soul its name had something of this sort in mind:  they thought when it was present in the body it was the cause of its living,
<milestone n="399e" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>giving it the power to breathe and reviving it (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀναψῦχον</foreign>), and when this revivifying force fails, the body perishes and comes to an end therefore, I think, they called it <foreign xml:lang="grc">ψυχή</foreign>.  But—please keep still a moment.  I fancy I see something which will carry more conviction
<milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="400"/><milestone n="400a" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>to Euthyphro and his followers;  for I think they would despise this attempt and would consider it cheap talk.  Now see if you like the new one.</said></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>