<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg005.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" resp="perseus" n="395"><milestone unit="page" resp="Stephanus" n="395"/><milestone n="395a" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> So it seems, Socrates.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> And his father’s name also appears to be in accordance with nature.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> It seems so.</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> Yes, for Agamemnon (admirable for remaining) is one who would resolve to toil to the end and to endure, putting the finish upon his resolution by virtue.  And a proof of this is his long retention of the host at <placeName key="tgn,7014164">Troy</placeName> and his endurance.  So the name Agamemnon denotes that this man is admirable for remaining.
<milestone n="395b" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>And so, too, the name of Atreus is likely to be correct;  for his murder of Chrysippus and the cruelty of his acts to Thyestes are all damaging and ruinous (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀτηρά</foreign>) to his virtue.  Now the form of his name is slightly deflected and hidden, so that it does not make the man’s nature plain to every one;  but to those who understand about names it makes the meaning of Atreus plain enough;  for indeed
<milestone n="395c" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>in view of his stubbornness (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀτειρές</foreign>) and fearlessness (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἄτρεστον</foreign>) and ruinous acts (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀτηρά</foreign>) the name is correctly given to him on every ground.  And I think Pelops also has a fitting name;  for this name means that he who sees only what is near deserves this designation.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> How is that?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> Why it is said of him that in murdering Myrtilus he was quite unable to forecast or foresee the ultimate effects upon his whole race, and all the misery with which it was overwhelmed,
<milestone n="395d" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>because he saw only the near at hand and the immediate— that is to say, <foreign xml:lang="grc">πέλας</foreign> (near)—in his eagerness to win by all means the hand of Hippodameia.  And any one would think the name of Tantalus was given rightly and in accordance with nature, if the stories about him are true.</said></p><p><said who="#Hermogenes"><label>Hermogenes.</label> What are the stories?</said></p><p><said who="#Socrates"><label>Socrates.</label> The many terrible misfortunes that happened to him both in his life, the last of which was the utter overthrow of his country, and in Hades, after his death,
<milestone n="395e" unit="section" resp="Stephanus"/>the balancing (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ταλαντεία</foreign>) of the stone above his head, in wonderful agreement with his name;  and it seems exactly as if someone who wished to call him most wretched (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ταλάντατον</foreign>) disguised the name and said Tantalus instead;  in some such way as that chance seems to have affected his name in the legend.</said></p></div></div></body></text></TEI>