Next comes his Justice in money matters. Of
 this what proofs can be more convincing than the following? No man ever made
 any complaint that he had been defrauded by Agesilaus: but many acknowledged
 that they had received many benefits from him. One who delighted to give
 away his own for the good of others could not possibly be minded to defraud
 others at the price of disgrace. For if he had coveted money it would have
 cost him far less trouble to keep his own than to take what did not belong
 to him. A man who would not leave unpaid debts of gratitude, which are not
 recoverable in the courts, cannot have been minded to commit thefts that are
 forbidden by law. And Agesilaus held it wrong not only to repudiate a debt
 of gratitude, but, having greater means, not to render in return a much
 greater kindness.