<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0029.tlg005.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="grc"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0029.tlg005.perseus-eng2" n="10"><p>and when he was there, among those who had been segregated from the rest of the world as felons, was looked upon as so debased that even there he was not thought worthy of the same treatment as the rest? It is said, in fact, that he was caught thieving among them and that, if there had been any other place more degraded where they could have isolated men who stole in prison, this monster would have been conducted there. These facts, as I said just now, were established by evidence against Aristogiton, as is well known, when the lot fell to him to be custodian of the exchange but he was rejected by those who then decided the appointment to that office.<note resp="editor">The custodians of the exchange were responsible for seeing that the laws governing import and export trade were observed. Like most magistrates, they were appointed by lot but were submitted to an examination in court (<foreign xml:lang="grc">δοκιμασία</foreign>) before taking office and could be rejected if unsuitable.</note> </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>