<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0028.tlg004.perseus-eng2"><div type="textpart" subtype="tetralogy" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0028.tlg004.perseus-eng2" n="2"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0028.tlg004.perseus-eng2:2" n="2"><p>In my opinion, the prosecution are setting both God and man at defiance in accusing me. He was the aggressor; and even if I had used steel or stone or wood to beat him off, I was acting within my rights; an aggressor deserves to be answered with, not the same, but more and worse than he gave. Actually, when he struck me with his fists, I used my own to retaliate for the blows which I received. Was that unjustified? </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0028.tlg004.perseus-eng2:2" n="3"><p>Well and good. <q rend="double" type="spoken">But,</q> he will object, <q rend="double; merge" type="spoken">the law which forbids the taking of life whether justifiably or not shows you to be liable to the penalty prescribed for murder; for the man is dead.</q> I repeat for a second and a third time that I did not kill him. Had the man died on the spot from the blows which he received, his death would have been due to me, not but what I would have been justified—an aggressor deserves to be answered with not the same, but more and worse than he gave; </p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>