<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0028.tlg004.perseus-eng2"><div type="textpart" subtype="tetralogy" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0028.tlg004.perseus-eng2" n="1"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0028.tlg004.perseus-eng2:1" n="6"><p>Had he killed his victim accidentally, he would have deserved some measure of mercy. But he wantonly committed a brutal assault upon an old man when in his cups; he struck him and throttled him until he robbed him of life. So for killing him he is liable to penalties prescribed for murder: and for violating every right to respect enjoyed by the aged he deserves to suffer in full the punishment usual in such cases. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0028.tlg004.perseus-eng2:1" n="7"><p>Thus the law rightly hands him over to you for punishment; and you have listened to the witnesses who were present during his drunken assault. It is your duty to take vengeance for the injury which he so lawlessly inflicted: to punish such brutal violence as harshly as the harm which it has caused requires: to deprive him in his turn of a life which was used to plot another’s death.</p></div></div><div type="textpart" subtype="tetralogy" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0028.tlg004.perseus-eng2" n="2"><head>Reply to a Charge of Murder, Arguing that the Accused Killed in Self-Defense</head><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0028.tlg004.perseus-eng2:2" n="1"><p> The fact that their speech was brief does not surprise me: because for them the danger is, not that they may come to some harm, but that they may fail to gratify their animosity by sending me to a death which I do not deserve. On the other hand, that they should want to treat the present matter, in which the victim had himself to blame more than me, as a case of the greatest gravity, gives me, I think, some excuse for indignation. By resorting to violence as he did and making a drunken assault upon a man far more in control of himself than he, he was responsible not only for the disaster which befell himself, but for the accusation which has been brought against me. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0028.tlg004.perseus-eng2:2" n="2"><p>In my opinion, the prosecution are setting both God and man at defiance in accusing me. He was the aggressor; and even if I had used steel or stone or wood to beat him off, I was acting within my rights; an aggressor deserves to be answered with, not the same, but more and worse than he gave. Actually, when he struck me with his fists, I used my own to retaliate for the blows which I received. Was that unjustified? </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0028.tlg004.perseus-eng2:2" n="3"><p>Well and good. <q rend="double" type="spoken">But,</q> he will object, <q rend="double; merge" type="spoken">the law which forbids the taking of life whether justifiably or not shows you to be liable to the penalty prescribed for murder; for the man is dead.</q> I repeat for a second and a third time that I did not kill him. Had the man died on the spot from the blows which he received, his death would have been due to me, not but what I would have been justified—an aggressor deserves to be answered with not the same, but more and worse than he gave; </p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>