<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0028.tlg002.perseus-eng2"><div type="textpart" subtype="tetralogy" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0028.tlg002.perseus-eng2" n="3"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0028.tlg002.perseus-eng2:3" n="7"><p>Again, in claiming an acquittal on the ground that he could foresee that he would be suspected, he is arguing falsely. If the defendant, whose position was desperate could be deterred from violence by the knowledge that suspicion would fall on himself, nobody at all would have planned the crime. Every one who stood in less danger than he would have been more frightened by the certainty of being suspected than by that danger, and would therefore have been less ready than he to use violence. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0028.tlg002.perseus-eng2:3" n="8"><p>His contributions to the Treasury and his provision of choruses may be satisfactory evidence of his wealth; but they are anything but evidence of his innocence. It was precisely his fear of losing his wealth which drove him to commit the murder; though an unscrupulous crime, it was to be expected of him. He objects that murderers are not those who were to be expected to commit murder, but those who actually did so. Now he would be quite right, provided that those who did commit it were known to us; but as they are not, proof must be based on what was to be expected; and that shows that the defendant, and the defendant alone, is the murderer. Crimes of this kind are committed in secret, not in front of witnesses. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0028.tlg002.perseus-eng2:3" n="9"><p>As he has been proved guilty of the murder so conclusively from his own defense, he is simply asking you to transfer his own defilement to yourselves. We make no requests; we merely remind you that if neither inferences from probability nor the evidence of witnesses prove the defendant guilty today, there remains no means of proving any defendant guilty. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0028.tlg002.perseus-eng2:3" n="10"><p>As you see, there is no doubt about the circumstances of the murder; suspicion points plainly to the defendant;<note resp="editor">Lit.: <q rend="double" type="translations">the tracks left by suspicion lead in the direction of the defendant.</q> <foreign xml:lang="grc">ὑποψία</foreign> is half personified and regarded as itself moving towards the person upon whom it is to settle. Cf. <foreign xml:lang="grc">τὰ ἴχνη τοῦ φόνου</foreign> in <bibl n="Antiph. 2.4.10">Antiph. 2.4.10</bibl>.</note> and the evidence of the slave is to be trusted so how can you in fairness acquit him? And if you acquit him unfairly, it is not upon us that the dead man’s curse will lie; it is upon you that he will bring disquiet.<note resp="editor">See Introduction.</note> </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0028.tlg002.perseus-eng2:3" n="11"><p>So with this in mind come to the victim’s aid, punish his murderer, and cleanse the city. Do this, and you will do three beneficial things; you will reduce the number of deliberate criminals; you will increase that of the godfearing; and you will yourselves be rid of the defilement which rests upon you in the defendant’s name.</p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>