<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0027.tlg003.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0027.tlg003.perseus-eng2" n="26"><p><q rend="double">Perfectly well,</q> say some, <q rend="double">provided that we protect <placeName key="perseus,Corinth">Corinth</placeName> and are allied with <placeName key="perseus,Argos">Argos</placeName>.</q> But if <placeName key="perseus,Sparta">Sparta</placeName> attacks <placeName key="perseus,Argos">Argos</placeName>, shall we go to her help or not? For we shall assuredly have no choice but to follow the one course or the other. Yet should we withhold our help, we are left without a single argument wherewith to justify ourselves or to show that <placeName key="perseus,Argos">Argos</placeName> has not the right to act as she pleases. On the other hand, should we give her our aid, is not a conflict with <placeName key="perseus,Sparta">Sparta</placeName> inevitable? And to what end? To enable us to lose our own territory as well as that of <placeName key="perseus,Corinth">Corinth</placeName> in the event of defeat, and to secure <placeName key="perseus,Corinth">Corinth</placeName> for <placeName key="perseus,Argos">Argos</placeName> in the event of victory. Will not that prove to be our object in fighting? </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>