<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0018.tlg005.1st1K-eng1" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0018.tlg005.1st1K-eng1" n="76"><p>Unless, indeed, we should say that the death of any individual man is the destruction of humanity and of the human race, which, whether we ought to call it a genus, or a species, or a conception, or whatever else you please, those who are anxious about the investigation of proper names may determine. One seal has often stamped thousands upon thousands of impressions in infinite number, and though at times all those impressions have been effaced with the substances on which they were stamped, still the seal itself has remained in its pristine condition without being at all injured in its nature.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0018.tlg005.1st1K-eng1" n="77"><p>Again, do we not think that the virtues, even if all the characters which they have impressed
<pb n="v.1.p.261"/>
upon the souls of those who have sought them should become effaced by wicked living, or by any other cause, would nevertheless preserve their own unadulterated and imperishable nature? Therefore, they who have not been duly initiated in instruction, not knowing anything about the differences between wholes and parts, or between genera and species, or about the homonymies which are incidental to these things, mix up all things together in a confused mass.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0018.tlg005.1st1K-eng1" n="78"><p>On which account every one who is a lover of self, by surname Cain, should learn that he has destroyed the namesake of Abel, that is to say species, individuality, the image made according to the model; not the archetypal pattern, nor the genus, nor the idea, which he thinks are destroyed together with animals, though, in fact, they are indestructible.
Let any one then say to him, reproving and ridiculing him, What is this that thou hast done, O wretched man? Does not the God-loving opinion which you flatter yourself that you have destroyed, live in the presence of God? But it is of yourself that you have become the murderer, by destroying from out of its seat the only quality by which you could live in a blameless manner.
</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0018.tlg005.1st1K-eng1" n="79"><milestone unit="chapter" n="22"/><p>And what was said afterwards is uttered very beautifully, with reference either to the beauty of the interpretation of which it is susceptible, or to the conception which may be discovered in it. "The voice of the blood of thy brother calls to me from out of the earth." This now, which is a very sublime expression if we regard the language in which it is couched, is intelligible to all those who are not utterly uninitiated in eloquence. But let us consider the ideas which are apparent in it as well as we are able.
And first of all, let us consider what is said about the blood;</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0018.tlg005.1st1K-eng1" n="80"><p>for in many places of the law as given by Moses, he pronounces the blood to be the essence of the soul or of life, saying distinctly, "For the life of all flesh is the blood thereof." <note xml:lang="eng" n="261.1">Leviticus xvii. 11. </note> And when the Creator of all living things first began to make man, after the creation of the heaven and the earth, and all the things which are between the two, Moses says, "And he breathed into his face the breath of life, and man became a living soul," showing again by this expression that it is the breath which
<note xml:lang="eng" n="261.1">Leviticus xvii. 11. </note>
<pb n="v.1.p.262"/>
is the essence of the life.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>