<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0018.tlg002.1st1K-eng1" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="book" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0018.tlg002.1st1K-eng1" n="1"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0018.tlg002.1st1K-eng1:1" n="31"><milestone unit="chapter" n="1.12"/><p><q rend="double">And God created man, taking a lump of clay from the earth, and breathed into his face the breath of life: and man became a living soul.</q> The races of men are twofold; for one is the heavenly man, and the other the earthly man. Now the heavenly man, as being born in the image of God, has no participation in any corruptible or earth-like essence. But the earthly man is made of loose material, which he calls a lump of clay. On which account he says, not that the heavenly man was made, but that he was fashioned according to the image of God; but the earthly man he calls a thing made, and not begotten by the maker.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0018.tlg002.1st1K-eng1:1" n="32"><p>And we must consider that the man who was formed of earth, means the mind which is to be infused into the body, but which has not yet been so infused. And this mind would be really earthly and corruptible, if it were not that God had breathed into it the spirit of genuine life; for then it <q rend="double">exists,</q> and is no longer made into a soul; and its soul is not inactive, and incapable of proper formation, but a really intellectual and living one. <q rend="double">For man,</q> says Moses, <q rend="double">became a living soul.</q>
</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0018.tlg002.1st1K-eng1:1" n="33"><milestone unit="chapter" n="1.13"/><p>But some one may ask, why God thought an earth-born mind, which was wholly devoted to the body, worthy of divine inspiration, and yet did not treat the one made after his own idea and image in the same manner. In the second place he may ask, what is the meaning of the expression <q rend="double">breathed into.</q> And thirdly, why he breathed into his face: fourthly also, why, since he knew the name of the Spirit when he says, <q rend="double">And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters,</q><note place="inline" resp="Yonge">Genesis i. 2. </note> he now speaks of breath, and not of the Spirit.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0018.tlg002.1st1K-eng1:1" n="34"><p>Now in reply to the first question we must say this one thing; God being very munificent gives his good things to all men, even to those who are not perfect; inviting them to a participation and rivalry in virtue, and at the same time displaying his abundant riches, and showing that it is sufficient for those also who will not be greatly benefited by it; and he also shows this in the most evident manner possible in other cases; for when he rains on the sea, and when he raises up fountains <pb n="v.1.p.61"/> in desert places, and waters shallow and rough and unproductive land, making the rivers to overflow with floods, what else is he doing but displaying the great abundance of his riches and of his goodness? This is the cause why he has created no soul in such a condition as to be wholly barren of good, even if the employment of that good be beyond the reach of some people.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0018.tlg002.1st1K-eng1:1" n="35"><p>We must also give a second reason, which is this: Moses wished to represent all the actions of the Deity as just—therefore a man who had not had a real life breathed into him, but who was ignorant of virtue, when he was chastised for the sins which he had committed would say that he was punished unjustly, in that it was only through ignorance of what was good that he had erred respecting it; and that he was to blame who had not breathed any proper wisdom into him; and perhaps he will even say, that he has absolutely committed no offence whatever; since some people affirm that actions done involuntarily and in ignorance have not the nature of offences.
</p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>