<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg034.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="3"><p rend="indent">With reference to the special plea my argument is a brief one. For even the defendants do not absolutely deny that a contract was made on your exchange<note resp="Loeb" anchored="true">The word rendered <q type="gloss">exchange</q> or <q type="gloss">market,</q> may well designate merely the Peiraeus, which was in a very real sense the <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐμπόριον</foreign> of <placeName key="perseus,Athens">Athens</placeName>.</note>; but they claim that there exists no longer any obligation on their part due to the contract, for they have done nothing that contravenes the terms of the agreement.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="4"><p>The laws, however, in accordance with which you sit as jurors, do not use this language. They do indeed allow the production of a special plea when there has been no contract at all at <placeName key="perseus,Athens">Athens</placeName> or for the Athenian market; but if a man admits that a contract was made, yet contends that he has done everything that the contract requires, they bid him to make a defence on the merits of the case, and not to make the plaintiff a defendant.<note resp="Loeb" anchored="true">As happened, of course, when a plea in bar of action was introduced.</note> Not but that I hope to prove from the facts of the case itself that this suit of mine is admissible.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>