<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg009.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="6"><p rend="indent"><delSpan spanTo="#a001"/>If, then, we were all agreed that Philip is at war with <placeName key="perseus,Athens">Athens</placeName> and is violating the peace, the only task of a speaker would be to come forward and recommend the safest and easiest method of defence; but since some of you are in such a strange mood that, though Philip is seizing cities, and retaining many of your possessions, and inflicting injury on everybody, you tolerate some speakers who repeatedly assert in the Assembly that the real aggressors are certain of ourselves, we must be on our guard and set this matter right.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="7"><p>For there is grave danger that anyone who proposes and urges that we shall defend ourselves may incur the charge of having provoked the war. I therefore first of all state and define this question—whether it is in our power to discuss the alternative of peace or war.<anchor xml:id="a001"/><note resp="Loeb" anchored="true">Probably the second clause has no connection with the first, but is an alternative form of the beginning of the next sentence.</note></p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="8"><p>If indeed <placeName key="perseus,Athens">Athens</placeName> can remain at peace and if the choice rests with us— to take that point first—I personally feel that we are bound to do so; and if anyone says that we can, I call upon him to move a resolution and to do something and to play us no tricks; but if there is another person concerned, with sword in hand and a mighty force at his back, who imposes on you with the name of peace but himself indulges in acts of war, what is left but to defend ourselves? If you choose to follow his example and profess that you are at peace, I raise no objection.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="9"><p>But if anyone mistakes for peace an arrangement which will enable Philip, when he has seized everything else, to march upon us, he has taken leave of his senses, and the peace that he talks of is one that you observe towards Philip, but not Philip towards you. That is the advantage which he is purchasing by all his expenditure of money—that he should be at war with you, but that you should not be at war with him.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="10"><p rend="indent">If we are going to wait for him to acknowledge a state of war with us, we are indeed the simplest of mortals; for even if he marches straight against <placeName key="tgn,7002681">Attica</placeName> and the <placeName key="perseus,Piraeus">Piraeus</placeName>, he will not admit it, if we may judge from his treatment of the other states.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>