<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg005.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="16"><p>If we went to war again with the Thebans about Oropus<note resp="Loeb" anchored="true">Oropus was in <placeName key="tgn,7002681">Attica</placeName>, close to the Boeotian frontier. A war for its
                        possession would therefore be confined to the Thebans and the Athenians, and
                        Demosthenes has no fear of the result.</note> or for some other private
                    reason, I do not think we should suffer, for both their allies and ours would,
                    of course, offer support, if their own territory were invaded, but would not
                    join either side in aggression. That is the way with every alliance worth
                    considering, and such is the natural result.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="17"><p>No individual ally is so fond either of us or of the Thebans as to regard our
                    security and our supremacy in the same light. Secure they would all have us, for
                    their own sakes; that either nation should gain supremacy and be their master
                    would suit none of them. What, then, is the danger that I think we must guard
                    against? Lest the inevitable war should afford all states a common pretext and a
                    common ground of complaint.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="18"><p>For if the Argives and Messenians and Megalopolitans, and other Peloponnesians
                    who side with them, quarrel with us because of our embassy to <placeName key="perseus,Sparta">Sparta</placeName> and because they think that we have
                    some interest in Lacedaemonian policy; and if the Thebans are, as people admit,
                    hostile and likely to be even more so, because we offer an asylum to their
                    exiles and make no disguise of our hostility to them in every way; </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="19"><p>and if the Thessalians dislike us because we protect the Phocian fugitives, and
                    Philip because we are trying to exclude him from the Amphictyonic Council; then
                    I am afraid that these separate powers, having each a private grudge, may make
                    common cause against us on the strength of the Amphictyonic decrees, and may
                    then be tempted to go beyond what their several interests require, as they were
                    in the case of the Phocians.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="20"><p>For of course you realize that in the present case the Thebans and Philip and the
                    Thessalians have acted in complete unison, though with widely different aims.
                    The Thebans, for instance, were powerless to prevent Philip from pressing on and
                    seizing the passes, or from coming in at the finish and usurping the credit of
                    their previous exertions.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>