<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg023.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="7"><p rend="align(indent)">Do not be surprised if I am found saying something which you have heard before; for one statement I may perhaps chance upon unwittingly, another I may consciously employ, if it is pertinent to the discussion.  Certainly I should be foolish if, although I see others using my thoughts, I alone should refrain from employing what I have previously said.<note resp="editor">For this apology see <bibl n="Isoc. 15.74">Isoc. 15.74</bibl> and <bibl n="Isoc. 5.93">Isoc. 5.93-94</bibl> (with Norlin’s note).</note></p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="8"><p>This is the reason, then, for these introductory words, that the very first precept I shall present is one of those most often repeated.  I am accustomed, that is, to tell the students in my school of rhetoric<note resp="editor">Literally “philosophy”; but for the meaning of “philosophy” in Isocrates see the General Introd. to Vol. I, pp. xxvi ff., of Isocrates (L.C.L.).</note> that the first question to be considered is—what is the object to be accomplished by the discourse as a whole and by its parts?  And when we have discovered this and the matter has been accurately determined, I say that we must seek the rhetorical elements whereby that which we have set out to do may be elaborated and fulfilled.  And this procedure I prescribe with reference to discourse, yet it is a principle applicable not only to all other matters, but also to your own affairs.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>