since they were as much superior to those who rule with absolute power as the wisest and
 gentlest of mankind may be said to excel the wildest and the most savage of the
 beasts. Compare Montaigne, Essays , chapter
 42: “Plutarch says somewhere that he does not find so great a difference between beast
 and beast as he does between man and man; which he says in reference to the internal
 qualities and perfections of the soul. And, in truth, I find so vast a difference
 between Epaminondas, according to my judgement of him, and some that I know, who are yet
 men of good sense, that I would willingly enhance upon Plutarch, and say that there is
 more difference between such and such a man than there is between such aman and such a
 beast.” For what among crimes that are unparalleled in their wickedness and
 cruelty shall we not find to have been perpetrated in the other states and especially in
 those which at the time of which I am speaking were considered the greatest and even now
 are so reputed? Has there not abounded in them murder of brothers and fathers and
 guest-friends; matricide and incest and begetting of children by sons with their own mothers; feasting
 of a father on the flesh of his own sons, plotted by those nearest of kin; exposure of
 infants by parents, and drownings and blindings Most of
 these horrors are taken from the Argive legend
 of the house of Pelops and the Theban story of the house of Labdacus: from the former,
 Thyestes feasting unwittingly upon the flesh of his own sons, served up to him by his
 brother, Atreus; from the latter, Oedipus exposed as a child by his parents to perish in
 the mountains, the slaying of Laius, his father, by Oedipus, the marriage of Oedipus to
 his own mother, Jocasta, the death at each other’s hands of the sons, Eteocles and
 Polyneices, who were born of that incestuous union, and the blinding of Oedipus. 
 and other iniquities so many in number that no lack of material has ever been felt by
 those who are wont each year to present in the theatre These stories furnished largely the themes of the tragic poets. the miseries
 which transpired in those days? I have recounted these atrocities with the desire, not of maligning these states, but of
 showing not only that nothing of the sort happened among the Athenians—for this would be a
 proof, not of their superior excellence, but merely that they were not of the same
 character as those who have proved themselves the most godless of men. However, those who
 undertake to praise any people in superlative terms must show, not only that they were not
 depraved, but that they excelled in all the virtues both those who lived at that time and
 those who are now living—which is the very claim that one may make for our ancestors. For they administered both the affairs of the state and their own affairs as righteously
 and honorably as was to be expected of men who were descended from the gods, According to to one story it was from the seeds sown by
 Hephaestus on the soil of Attica that the
 Athenians were sprung. See Aesch. Eum. 13 . who
 were the first to found a city and to make use of laws, See
 Isoc. 4.39-40 and notes. who at all times had
 practised reverence in relation to the gods and justice in relation to mankind, who were
 neither of mixed origin nor invaders of a foreign territory but were, on the contrary,
 alone among the Hellenes, sprung from the soil itself, See Isoc. 4.24 and note. possessing in this land the nurse of their very
 existence and cherishing it as fondly as the best of children cherish their fathers and
 mothers, and who, furthermore, were so beloved of the gods that—what is of all things in
 the world the most difficult and rare, namely, to find examples of royal houses or houses
 of absolute rulers remaining in power through four or five generations—