<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg020.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div n="86" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> The point of departure, then, which I have taken for my whole discussion is, I believe,
          the one which is proper for those who urge an expedition against Asia.<note resp="editor">Cf. <bibl n="Isoc. 4.15">Isoc. 4.15</bibl>.</note> For one
          must undertake nothing until he finds the Hellenes doing one of two things: either
          actually supporting the undertaking or according it their entire approval. It was this
          which Agesilaus, for all that he was looked upon as the most sagacious of the
          Lacedaemonians, disregarded, not because of incapacity but because of ambition. </p></div><div n="87" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>For he had two aims, which, though laudable, were not consistent, and could not he
          carried out at the same time, since he was resolved both to make war against the King and
          to restore his friends to their cities and put them in control of affairs.<note resp="editor">The same explanation of Agesilaus’s failure is given in <bibl n="Isoc. L. 9.13">Isoc. Letter 9.13</bibl>.</note> Naturally the result of his efforts
          in behalf of his friends was that the Hellenes were involved in troubles and perils, and,
          owing to the confusion which arose at home, had neither the time nor the power to make war
          upon the barbarians. </p></div><div n="88" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>So from the mistakes of inadvertence at that time it is easy to draw the lesson that
          those who would take sane counsel must not begin a war against the King until someone has
          composed the quarrels of the Hellenes and has cured them of the madness which now afflicts
          them. And this is just what I have advised you to do. </p></div><div n="89" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> On these points no man of intelligence would venture to contradict me. But I think that
          if any of the others should be prompted to advise you in favor of the expedition against
          Asia, they would resort to a plea of this kind: that it has been the fortune of all who
          have undertaken a war against the King, without exception, to rise from obscurity to
          brilliant distinction, from poverty to wealth, and from low estate to be masters of many
          lands and cities. </p></div><div n="90" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>I, however, am not going to urge you on such grounds, but by the example of men who were
          looked upon as failures: I mean those who took the field with Cyrus and Clearchus.<note resp="editor">See <bibl n="Isoc. 4.145-149">Isoc. 4.145-149</bibl>, where
            the same episode is used to the same point in similar language.</note> Every one agrees
          that these won as complete a victory in battle over all the forces of the King as if they
          had come to blows with their womenfolk, but that at the very moment when they seemed to be
          masters of the field they failed of success, owing to the impetuosity of Cyrus. For he in
          his exultation rushed in pursuit far in advance of the others; and, being caught in the
          midst of the enemy, was killed. </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>