<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg020.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div n="11" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>and I realized also that it is difficult to deliver two discourses with tolerable success
          upon the same subject, especially when the one which was first published was so written
          that even my detractors imitate and admire it more than do those who praise it to excess.
        </p></div><div n="12" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>Nevertheless, disregarding all these difficulties, I have become so ambitious in my old
          age that I have determined by addressing my discourse to you at the same time to set an
          example to my disciples and make it evident to them that to burden our national assemblies
          with oratory and to address all the people who there throng together is, in reality, to
          address no one at all;<note resp="editor">The same sentiment is expressed in
              <bibl n="Isoc. L. 1.6">Isoc. Letter 1.6-7</bibl>. See General Introd. pp. xxxvi.
            ff.</note> that such speeches are quite as ineffectual as the legal codes and
            constitutions<note resp="editor">Possibly a disparagement of Plato’s
              <title>Republic</title> and <title>Laws</title> (see Blass, <title>Die attische
              Beredsamkeit,</title> ii. p. 4), but more probably of Isocrates’ unfriendly rival,
            Antisthenes, who, according to <bibl n="D. L. 6.1.16">Diog. Laert. 6.1.16</bibl>, wrote
            a work <title>On Law, or the Constitution of a State</title>.</note> drawn up by the
          sophists; </p></div><div n="13" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>and, finally, that those who desire, not to chatter empty nonsense, but to further some
          practical purpose, and those who think they have hit upon some plan for the common good,
          must leave it to others to harangue at the public festivals, but must themselves win over
          someone to champion their cause from among men who are capable not only of speech but of
          action and who occupy a high position in the world—if, that is to say, they are to command
          any attention. </p></div><div n="14" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> It was with this mind that I chose to address to you what I have to say—not that I
          singled you out to curry your favor, although in truth I would give much to speak
          acceptably to you. It was not, however, with this in view that I came to my decision, but
          rather because I saw that all the other men of high repute were living under the control
          of politics and laws,<note resp="editor">See 127 and General Introd. p.
            xlii.</note> with no power to do anything save what was prescribed, and that,
          furthermore, they were sadly unequal to the enterprise which I shall propose; </p></div><div n="15" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>while you and you alone had been granted by fortune free scope both to send ambassadors
          to whom ever you desire and to receive them from whom ever you please, and to say whatever
          you think expedient; and that, besides, you, beyond any of the Hellenes, were possessed of
          both wealth and power, which are the only things in the world that are adapted at once to
          persuade and to compel; and these aids, I think, even the cause which I shall propose to
          you will need to have on its side. </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>