<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg018.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div n="69" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>And in truth it was because of this spirit that they brought us into such concord with
          each other and so far advanced the power of the city that the Lacedaemonians, who under
          the rule of the oligarchy laid their commands upon us almost every day, under the rule of
          the people came begging and supplicating us not to allow them to be driven from their
            homes.<note resp="editor">After the Battle of Leuctra. See <bibl n="Isoc. 8.105">Isoc. 8.105</bibl>; <bibl n="Xen. Hell. 6.5.33">Xen. Hell. 6.5.33
              ff.</bibl></note> In a word the spirit of the two parties was this: the oligarchies
          were minded to rule over their fellow-citizens and be subject to their enemies; the
          people, to rule over the world at large and share the power of the state on equal terms
          with their fellow-citizens. </p></div><div n="70" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> I have recounted these things for two reasons: because I wanted to show, in the first
          place, that I am not in favor of oligarchy or special privilege, but of a just and orderly
          government of the people, and, in the second place, that even badly constituted
          democracies are responsible for fewer disasters than are oligarchies, while those which
          are well-ordered are superior to oligarchies in that they are more just, more impartial,
          and more agreeable to those who live under them. </p></div><div n="71" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> But perhaps some of you may wonder what my purpose is in trying to persuade you to
          exchange the polity which has achieved so many fine things for another, and why it is that
          after having just now eulogized democracy in such high terms, I veer about capriciously
          and criticize and condemn the present order. </p></div><div n="72" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>Well, I reproach men in private life when they succeed in a few things and fail in many,
          and regard them as falling short of what they ought to be; and, more than that, when men
          are sprung from noble ancestors and yet are only a little better than those who are
          distinguished for depravity, and much worse than their fathers, I rebuke them and would
          counsel them to cease from being what they are. </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>