for when we might have lived at ease, we made more wars than were necessary, but now,
 when we have no choice but to risk battle, we desire tranquility and deliberate about our
 own security. And yet those who wish to be free ought to shun a peace whose terms are
 dictated by the enemy as being not far removed from slavery, and should make treaties only
 when they have defeated their adversaries, or when they have made their forces equal to
 those of the enemy; for the kind of peace which each side will obtain will be decided by
 the manner in which they conclude the war. Bearing these facts in mind, you must not rashly commit yourselves to shameful terms,
 nor let it appear that you are more remiss in your deliberations about your country than
 about the rest of the world. Let me recall to your minds that formerly, if a single
 Lacedaemonian gave aid to one of our allied cities when it was pressed by siege, all men
 would concede that its deliverance was due to him. Now the older among you could name the
 greater number of these men, but I, too, can recount the most illustrious of them: Pedaritus, Harmost of Chios in 412 B.C. , who was successful against
 the Athenians for a time, but was defeated and slain in 412
 B.C. See Thucyd. viii. 55. 3. sailing to Chios , saved that city; Brasidas entered Amphipolis and, having rallied about him a few of
 those who were under siege, defeated the besiegers Brasidas
 entered Amphipolis in 422 B.C. , and in command of 150 hoplites sallied out against Cleon, the
 Athenian general. The greater part of the besieged forces was commanded by Clearidas.
 Brasidas lost his life in the engagement which followed, and became after his death a
 local hero at Amphipolis . See Thucyd. v.
 8-11. in battle in spite of their numbers; Gylippus, by bringing aid to the
 Syracusans, not only saved them from destruction, but also captured the entire armament of
 the enemy, which dominated them both by land and by sea. In
 the memorable Sicilian expedition of 414 B.C. Gylippus
 defeated the Athenian general Nicias and took his entire forces captive. 
 And yet is it not shameful that in those days single men among us were strong enough to
 protect the cities of others, but now all of us together are not able, nor do we attempt,
 to save our own city? Is it not shameful that, when we fought for others, we filled
 Europe and Asia with trophies, but now, when
 our own country is so openly outraged, we cannot show that we have fought in her behalf a
 single battle worthy of note? That is, since the battle of
 Leuctra. In addition to others mentioned above, Agesilaus, father of Archidamus, had won
 many victories in Asia Minor ( 396-394 B.C. ). 
 Is it not shameful, finally, that other cities have endured the last extremities of siege
 to preserve our empire, For example, Thespiae . See Xen. Hell.
 6.3 . For other examples see Paus. 9.14 , and Dio. Sic. 15.57 and 69. while we ourselves see no reason
 why we should bear even slight hardships to prevent our being forced to do anything
 contrary to our just rights, but are to be seen even at this moment feeding teams of
 ravenous horses, Horses were kept for racing, and were
 regarded as an expensive luxury. although, like men reduced to the direst
 extremities and in want of their daily bread, we sue for peace in this fashion?