Now in the case of Sparta I can cite no
 instance of this kind, for in times past no nation stronger than ourselves ever invaded
 our territory; That is, before the Theban invasion of 369 B.C. but in the case of other states there are many
 such examples which one might use, and especially is this true of the city of the
 Athenians. For we shall find that as a result of dictating to others they lost repute with the
 Hellenes, while by defending themselves against insolent invaders they won fame among all
 mankind. Now if I were to recount the wars of old which they fought against the Amazons or
 the Thracians or the Peloponnesians See Isoc. 4.56 and 70. who under the leadership of Eurystheus
 invaded Attica , no doubt I should be thought to
 speak on matters ancient and remote from the present situation; but in their war against
 the Persians, See Isoc.
 4.71-98 . who does not know from what hardships they arose to great
 good-fortune? For they alone of those who dwelt outside of the Peloponnesus , although they saw that the strength of the barbarians was
 irresistible, did not think it honorable to consider the terms imposed upon them, These terms were to give earth and water, in token of
 submission, to the heralds of the Great King. Hdt.
 7.133 . but straightway chose to see their city ravaged rather than
 enslaved. Leaving their own country, Cf. Isoc. 4.96 . and adopting Freedom as their fatherland,
 they shared the dangers of war with us, and wrought such a change in their fortunes that,
 after being deprived of their own possessions for but a few days, they became for many
 years masters of the rest of the world. Cf. Isoc. 4.72 . 
 Athens , however, is not the only instance by
 which one might show how great are the advantages of daring to resist one’s enemies. There
 is also the case of the tyrant Dionysius, who, when he was besieged by the Carthaginians,
 seeing not a glimmer of hope for deliverance, but being hard pressed both by the war and
 by the disaffection of his citizens, was, for his part, on the point of sailing away, when
 one of his companions made bold to declare that “royalty is a glorious shroud.” That is, it is a glorious thing to die a king. For the event,
 396 B.C. , See Dio. Sic. 14.58 ,
 and for the anecdote, Dio. Sic. 14.8.5 and Ael. Var. Hist. 4.8 . 
 Ashamed of what he had planned to do, and taking up the war afresh, he destroyed
 countless hosts of the Carthaginians, Dio. Sic. 14.72.6 , says the shore was strewn with
 corpses. strengthened his authority over his subjects, acquired far greater
 dominion than he had possessed before, ruled with absolute power until his death, Dionysius died in the spring of 367
 B.C. and left his son in possession of the same honors and powers as he
 himself had enjoyed.