Furthermore, of the returns to their thrones by princes of ancient times the most
 renowned are those of which the poets tell us: indeed they not only chronicle for us those
 which have been most glorious, but also compose new ones of their own invention.
 Nevertheless no poet has told the story of any legendary prince who has faced hazards so
 formidable and yet regained his throne: on the contrary, most of their heroes have been
 represented as having regained their kingdoms by chance, others as having employed deceit
 and artifice to overcome their foes. Nay, of those who lived later, perhaps indeed of all, the one hero who was most admired
 by the greatest number was Cyrus, who deprived the Medes of their kingdom and gained it
 for the Persians. But while Cyrus with a Persian army conquered the Medes, a deed which
 many a Greek or a barbarian could easily do, Evagoras manifestly accomplished the greater
 part of the deeds which have been mentioned through strength of his own mind and body.
 Again, while it is not at all certain from the expedition of Cyrus that he would have
 endured the dangers of Evagoras, yet it is obvious to all from the deeds of Evagoras that
 the latter would have readily attempted the exploits of Cyrus. In addition, while piety
 and justice characterized every act of Evagoras, some of the successes of Cyrus were
 gained impiously: for the former destroyed his enemies, but Cyrus slew his mother’s
 father. Astyages, father of Mandane, who married
 Cambyses, father of Cyrus. That Cyrus slew Astyages is not stated by any other
 writer. Consequently if any should wish to judge, not of the greatness of their
 successes, but of the essential merit of each, they would justly award greater praise to
 Evagoras than even to Cyrus. And if there is need to speak concisely, without reservation or fear of arousing
 ill-feeling, but with the utmost frankness, I would say that no one, whether mortal,
 demigod, or immortal, will be found to have obtained his throne more nobly, more
 splendidly, or more piously. Anyone would in the highest degree be confirmed in this
 belief if, distrusting completely what I have said, he were to set about examining how
 each gained royal power. For it will be manifest that it is through no desire whatever of
 grandiloquence, but because of the truth of the matter, that I have spoken thus boldly
 about Evagoras. Now if he had distinguished himself in unimportant ways only, he would fittingly be
 thought worthy also of praise of like nature: but as it is, all would admit that of all
 blessings whether human or divine supreme power is the greatest, the most august, and the
 object of greatest strife. That man, therefore, who has most gloriously acquired the most
 glorious of possessions, what poet or what artificer of words λόγων εὑρετής is found also in Isoc. 5.144 . It means “prose-writer,” and refers especially to
 composers of “set discourses” or “show-pieces.” could raise in a manner worthy of
 his deeds?