<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg014.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div n="1" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> There are people who frown upon eloquence and censure men who study philosophy,<note resp="editor">For Isocrates’ use of the word “philosophy” as covering what
            we mean by “culture” and his identification of “discourse” with the cultivated life see
            General Introduction, pp. xxiii ff.</note> asserting that those who engage in such
          occupations do so, not for the sake of virtue, but for their own advantage. Now, I should
          be glad if those who take this position would tell me why they blame men who are ambitious
          to speak well, but applaud men who desire to act rightly; for if it is the pursuit of
          one’s own advantage which gives them offense, we shall find that more and greater
          advantages are gained from actions than from speech. </p></div><div n="2" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>Moreover, it is passing strange if the fact has escaped them that we reverence the gods
          and practice justice, and cultivate the other virtues, not that we may be worse off than
          our fellows, but that we may pass our days in the enjoyment of as many good things as
          possible. They should not, therefore, condemn these means by which one may gain
            advantage<note resp="editor">Advantage (in the good sense) which works no
            disadvantage to others. Cf. <bibl n="Isoc. 15.275">Isoc. 15.275</bibl>.</note> without
          sacrifice of virtue, but rather those men who do wrong in their actions or who deceive by
          their speech and put their eloquence to unjust uses. </p></div><div n="3" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> I am astonished that those who hold the view to which I have just referred do not rail
          also against wealth and strength and courage; for if they are really hostile to eloquence
          because there are men who do wrong and speak falsehood, they ought to disparage as well
          all other good things; for there will be found also among men who possess these some who
          do wrong and use these advantages to the injury of many.<note resp="editor">Good things are bad if badly used. See <bibl n="Aristot. Nic. Eth. 1094b">Aristot. Nic.
              Eth. 1094b 17</bibl>. Cf. Seneca, <title>Ep.</title> i. 5. 9: “<foreign xml:lang="lat">multa bona nostra nobis
            nocent.</foreign>”</note>
        </p></div><div n="4" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>Nevertheless, it is not fair to decry strength because there are persons who assault
          people whom they encounter, nor to traduce courage because there are those who slay men
          wantonly, nor in general to transfer to things the depravity of men, but rather to put the
          blame on the men themselves who misuse the good things, and who, by the very powers which
          might help their fellow-countrymen, endeavor to do them harm.<note resp="editor">The same argument is made at length in <bibl n="Isoc. 15.251">Isoc.
              15.251-252</bibl>, also in defense of eloquence.</note>
        </p></div><div n="5" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> But the fact is that since they have not taken the trouble to make distinctions after
          this manner in each instance, they are ill-disposed to all eloquence; and they have gone
          so far astray as not to perceive that they are hostile to that power which of all the
          faculties that belong to the nature of man is the source of most of our blessings. For in
          the other powers which we possess we are in no respect superior to other living creatures;
          nay, we are inferior to many in swiftness and in strength and in other resources; </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>