<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg013.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div n="41" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>But the truth is that in discourses of this sort we should not seek novelties, for in
          these discourses it is not possible to say what is paradoxical or incredible or outside
          the circle of accepted belief; but, rather, we should regard that man as the most
          accomplished in this field who can collect the greatest number of ideas scattered among
          the thoughts of all the rest and present them in the best form. </p></div><div n="42" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Moreover, this has been clear to me from the first, that while all men think that those
          compositions, whether in verse or prose, are the most useful which counsel us how to live,
          yet it is certainly not to them that they listen with greatest pleasure; nay, they feel
          about these just as they feel about the people who admonish them; for while they praise
          the latter, they choose for associates<note resp="editor">Cf. <bibl n="Isoc. 1.45">Isoc. 1.45</bibl>.</note> those who share in, and not those who would
          dissuade them from, their faults. </p></div><div n="43" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>As a case in point, one might cite the poetry of Hesiod and Theognis and Phocylides;<note resp="editor">Theognis and Phocylides (middle of sixth century) were the
            leading gnomic poets. Theognis was used in the schools, and we have over a thousand of
            his verses. Phocylides survives in but a few fragments. Hesiod is classed with them
            because in his epic <title>The Works and Days</title> are scattered many maxims.</note>
          for these, they say, have proved the best counsellors for human conduct; but in spite of
          what they say, people prefer to occupy themselves with each other’s follies rather than
          with the admonitions of these teachers. </p></div><div n="44" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>And, again, if one were to make a selection from the leading poets of their maxims, as we
          call them, into which they have put their best thought, men would show a similar attitude
          toward them also; for they would lend a readier ear to the cheapest comedy<note resp="editor">Isocrates had a poor opinion of comedy, himself having been
            subjected to its licence. Cf. <bibl n="Isoc. 8.14">Isoc. 8.14</bibl>.</note> than to the
          creations of such finished art. Yet why should I spend time in giving single instances?
        </p></div><div n="45" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>For if we are willing to survey human nature as a whole, we shall find that the majority
          of men do not take pleasure in the food<note resp="editor">Cf. <bibl n="Isoc. 1.45">Isoc. 1.45</bibl>.</note> that is the most wholesome, nor in the
          pursuits that are the most honorable, nor in the actions that are the noblest, nor in the
          creatures that are the most useful, but that they have tastes which are in every way
          contrary to their best interests, while they view those who have some regard for their
          duty as men of austere and laborious lives. </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>