To put it briefly—and not to speak in detail but in general terms,— who of those that have fought against them has not come off with success, and who of those that have fallen under their power has not perished from their atrocities? Take the case of Conon, Conon was one of the Athenian generals at the battle of Aegospatomi. After that disaster he left Greece and took service with the Persians against Sparta , and was instrumental in the defeat of the Spartan fleet at the battle of Cnidus . For the treachery referred to here see Grote, Hist. ix. p. 187. who, as commander in the service of Asia , brought an end to the power of the Lacadaemonians: did they not shamelessly seize him for punishment by death? Take, on the other hand, the case of Themistocles, Themistocles, commander of the Athenian fleet at Salamis , was later ostracized and took refuge at the Persian court. See Grote, Hist. v. p. 138. who in the service of Hellas defeated them at Salamis : did they not think him worthy of the greatest gifts? Then why should we cherish the friendship of men who punish their benefactors and so openly flatter those who do them injury? Who is there among us whom they have not wronged? When have they given the Hellenes a moment’s respite from their treacherous plots? What in our world is not hateful to them who did not shrink in the earlier war from rifling even the images and temples of the gods, and burning them to the ground? When they captured Athens . See Isoc. 4.96 ; Hdt. 8.53 ; Aesch. Pers. 809 . Therefore, the Ionians deserve to be commended because, when their sanctuaries had been burned, they invoked the wrath of Heaven upon any who should disturb the ruins or should desire to restore their shrines as they were of old; There is no other authority for this oath of the Ionians. A similar oath is, however, attributed by Lyc. 1.81 , to the collective Greeks before the battle of Plataea . and they did this, not because they lacked the means to rebuild them, but in order that there might be left a memorial to future generations of the impiety of the barbarians, and that none might put their trust in men who do not scruple to commit such sins against our holy temples, but that all might be on their guard against them and fear them, seeing that they waged that war not against our persons only, but even against our votive offerings to the gods. Of my own countrymen also I have a similar tale to tell. For towards all other peoples with whom they have been at war, they forget their past enmities the moment they have concluded peace, but toward the Asiatics they feel no gratitude even when they receive favors from them; so eternal is the wrath which they cherish against the barbarians. See Plat. Rep. 470c ; Livy 31.29 , “cum barbaris omnibus Graecis bellum est eritque.” Again, our fathers condemned many to death See Hdt. 9.5 ; Lyc. 1.122 ; Dem. 19.270 . for defection to the Medes; in our public assemblies even to this day, before any other business is transacted, the Athenians call down curses The custom is attributed to Aristeides by Plut. Arist. 10 . upon any citizen who proposes friendly overtures to the Persians; and, at the celebration of the Mysteries, the Eumolpidae and the Kerykes, The priests at Eleuis belonged to families traditionally descended from Eumolpus and Keryx. because of our hatred of the Persians, give solemn warning to the other barbarians also, even as to men guilty of murder, that they are for ever banned from the sacred rites. See Hdt. 8.65 ; Lobeck, Aglaophamus , i. p. 15.