<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg011.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div n="1" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Many times have I wondered at those who first convoked the national assemblies and
          established the athletic games,<note resp="editor">Pan-Hellenic gatherings at
            the Olympic, Pythian, Nemean and Isthmian games, including also the Pan-atheniac
            festival at <placeName key="perseus,Athens">Athens</placeName>. See <placeName key="tgn,2344969">Gardner</placeName> and Jevons, <title>Manual of Greek
              Antiquities,</title> pp. 269 ff.</note> amazed that they should have thought the
          prowess of men’s bodies to be deserving of so great bounties, while to those who had
          toiled in private for the public good and trained their own minds so as to be able to help
          also their fellow-men they apportioned no reward whatsoever,<note resp="editor">This is not quite exact (see <bibl n="Lys. 33.2">Lys. 33.2</bibl>), nor
            consistent with § 45 where he mentions contests of intellect and prizes for them. But
            the mild interest which these evoked served but to emphasize the excess of enthusiasm
            for athletics against which Isocrates here and elsewhere protests. Cf. <bibl n="Isoc. 15.250">Isoc. 15.250</bibl> and <bibl n="Isoc. L. 8.5">Isoc. Letter
              8.5</bibl>. The complaint is older than Isocrates. See Xenophanes, Fr. 19.</note>
        </p></div><div n="2" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>when, in all reason, they ought rather to have made provision for the latter; for if all
          the athletes should acquire twice the strength which they now possess, the rest of the
          world would be no better off; but let a single man attain to wisdom, and all men will reap
          the benefit who are willing to share his insight. </p></div><div n="3" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Yet I have not on this account lost heart nor chosen to abate my labors; on the
          contrary, believing that I shall have a sufficient reward in the approbation which my
          discourse will itself command, I have come before you to give my counsels on the war
          against the barbarians and on concord among ourselves. I am, in truth, not unaware that
          many of those who have claimed to be sophists<note resp="editor">For the
            meaning of the word “sophist” see General Introd. p. xii. The word is commonly
            translated “orator,” since the sophists concerned themselves mainly with exemplifying
            and teaching oratory; but the sophist speaks only on the lecture platform; the political
            orator is called a “rhetor” in Isocrates. Gorgias and Lysias in their Olympic orations
            had spoken on this theme, but it is hardly probable that Isocrates had them particularly
            in mind in this patronizing remark.</note>
        </p></div><div n="4" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>have rushed upon this theme, but I hope to rise so far superior to them that it will seem
          as if no word had ever been spoken by my rivals upon this subject; and, at the same time,
          I have singled out as the highest kind of oratory<note resp="editor">Cf. <bibl n="Lys. 33.3">Lys. 33.3</bibl>. For Isocrates, idea of the highest oratory see General
            Introd. p. xxiv.</note> that which deals with the greatest affairs and, while best
          displaying the ability of those who speak, brings most profit to those who hear; and this
          oration is of that character. </p></div><div n="5" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>In the next place, the moment for action has not yet gone by, and so made it now futile
          to bring up this question; for then, and only then, should we cease to speak, when the
          conditions have come to an end and there is no longer any need to deliberate about them,
          or when we see that the discussion of them is so complete that there is left to others no
          room to improve upon what has been said. </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>