<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg010.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div n="31" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>For, when you wished to praise Busiris, you chose to say that he forced the <placeName key="tgn,1127805">Nile</placeName> to break into branches and surround the land<note resp="editor">Cf. <bibl n="Hdt. 2.16">Hdt. 2.16</bibl>, where the same verb
              (<foreign xml:lang="grc">περιρρήγνυμι</foreign>) is used in connexion with the
            branches of the <placeName key="tgn,1127805">Nile</placeName> in the Delta.</note>, and
          that he sacrificed and ate strangers who came to his country; but you gave no proof that
          he did these things. And yet is it not ridiculous to demand that others follow a procedure
          which you yourself have not used in the slightest degree? </p></div><div n="32" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>Nay, your account is far less credible than mine, since I attribute to him no impossible
          deed, but only laws and political organization, which are the accomplishments of honorable
          men, whereas you represent him as the author of two astounding acts which no human being
          would commit, one requiring the cruelty of wild beasts, the other the power of the gods.
        </p></div><div n="33" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>Further, even if both of us, perchance, are wrong, I, at any rate, have used only such
          arguments as authors of eulogies must use; you, on the contrary, have employed those which
          are appropriate to revilers. Consequently, it is obvious that you have gone astray, not
          only from the truth, but also from the entire pattern which must be employed in eulogy.
        </p></div><div n="34" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Apart from these considerations, if your discourse should be put aside and mine
          carefully examined, no one would justly find fault with it. For if it were manifest that
          another had done the deeds which I assert were done by him, I acknowledge that I am
          exceedingly audacious in trying to change men’s views about matters of which all the world
          has knowledge. </p></div><div n="35" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>But as it is, since the question is open to the judgement of all and one must resort to
          conjecture, who, reasoning from what is probable, would be considered to have a better
          claim to the authorship of the institutions of <placeName key="tgn,7016833">Egypt</placeName> rather than a son of Poseidon, a descendant of Zeus on his mother’s
          side, the most powerful personage of his time and the most renowned among all other
          peoples? For surely it is not fitting that any who were in all these respects inferior
          should, in preference to Busiris, have the credit of being the authors of those great
          benefactions. </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>