<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg005.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div n="54" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>I see that in private and public causes you judge that nothing is more deserving of
          belief, or truer, than testimony given under torture, and that while you think it possible
          to suborn witnesses even for acts which never occurred at all, yet that testimony under
          torture clearly shows which party is telling the truth.<note resp="editor">A
            commonplace; cf. <bibl n="Antiph. 6.25">Antiph. 6.25</bibl>.</note> Pasion, being aware
          of this, wished that in this affair you should judge by conjecture rather than know the
          exact truth. For he certainly would not be able to say that he was likely to be at a
          disadvantage if torture should be used and that for this reason the surrender of his slave
          could not reasonably be expected of him. </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>