<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg005.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div n="46" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>And yet, which is the more reasonable supposition—that I, involved in misfortunes so
          great brought unjust charges against Pasion or that he, because of the magnitude of our
          misfortunes and the large sum of money involved, was tempted to defraud us? But what man
          ever went so far in chicanery as, with his own life in jeopardy, to plot against the
          possessions of others?<note resp="editor">For the same argument cf. <bibl n="Isoc. 21.14">Isoc. 21.14</bibl>.</note> With what hope or with what intent would I
          have unjustly proceeded against Pasion? Was it my thought that, in fear of my influence,
          he would forthwith give me money? But neither the one nor the other of us was in such a
          situation. </p></div><div n="47" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>Or was I of opinion that by bringing the matter to issue in court I should have greater
          influence with you than Pasion, even contrary to justice—I, who was not even preparing to
          remain in Athens, since I feared that Satyrus would demand of you my extradition? Or was I
          going to act so that, without accomplishing anything, I should make a personal enemy of
          the man with whom, as it happened, of all the inhabitants of Athens, I was on terms of
          greatest intimacy? Who of you, I ask, would think it right to condemn me as being guilty
          of such folly and stupidity? </p></div><div n="48" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> It is also right, men of the jury, that you should note the absurdity and the
          incredibility of the arguments which Pasion on each occasion undertook to present. For
          when my situation was such that, even if he acknowledged that he was defrauding me of my
          money, I could not have exacted the penalty from him, it is then that he accuses me of
          trying to make unjust claims; but when I had been declared innocent of the slanderous
          charges lodged with Satyrus and all thought that he would lose his suit, it is then that
          he says I renounced all claims against him. And yet how could anything be more illogical
          than this? </p></div><div n="49" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> But, you may say, perhaps it is on these matters only, and not on the others, that he
          obviously contradicts himself in both words and deeds. Yet he is the man who, though he
          alleged that the slave whom he himself had spirited away had been enslaved by us, yet
          listed this same person in his property-schedule as a slave along with his other servants,
          and then when Menexenus demanded that this slave give testimony under torture, Pasion
          brought about his release on the ground that he was a freeman! </p></div><div n="50" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>Furthermore, while he himself was defrauding me of my deposit, he had the impudence to
          accuse us of having six talents from his bank. And yet when a man did not hesitate to lie
          in matters so obvious to everybody, how can he be believed about matters transacted
          between us two alone? </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>